|Summary:||net/xrdp-devel: Update to 0.9.4|
|Product:||Ports & Packages||Reporter:||Koichiro Iwao <meta>|
|Component:||Individual Port(s)||Assignee:||Luca Pizzamiglio <pizzamig>|
|Severity:||Affects Only Me||CC:||meta, pizzamig|
Description Koichiro Iwao 2017-11-08 07:33:21 UTC
Created attachment 187842 [details] patch Poudriere build passed for me. This port backports some patches from upstream to fix upstream issue 730 and 910. Release note: https://github.com/neutrinolabs/xrdp/releases/tag/v0.9.4
Comment 1 Luca Pizzamiglio 2017-11-14 10:08:04 UTC
Created attachment 187988 [details] build failure log The build fails on all supported FreeBSD versions. The build log is attached. It looks to me that the patch-issue-730 is the problem (the missing symbol is used there).
Comment 2 Koichiro Iwao 2017-11-14 11:39:27 UTC
Created attachment 187989 [details] patch I've updated patch-issue-730.
Comment 3 Koichiro Iwao 2017-11-14 11:45:37 UTC
Created attachment 187990 [details] patch The previous pach was invalid. Fixed patch again. It passed certainly poudriere build.
Comment 4 Luca Pizzamiglio 2017-11-14 11:57:45 UTC
The current patch is still invalid, it just deletes files like Makefile and distinfo.
Comment 5 Koichiro Iwao 2017-11-14 12:52:48 UTC
Created attachment 187992 [details] patch Oops, sorry. Patch again.
Comment 6 commit-hook 2017-11-15 10:16:34 UTC
A commit references this bug: Author: pizzamig Date: Wed Nov 15 10:16:18 UTC 2017 New revision: 454230 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/454230 Log: net/xrdp-devel: Update to 0.9.4 PR: 223512 Submitted by: email@example.com (maintainer) Approved by: olivier (mentor) Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D13097 Changes: head/net/xrdp-devel/Makefile head/net/xrdp-devel/distinfo head/net/xrdp-devel/files/patch-configure.ac head/net/xrdp-devel/files/patch-issue-730 head/net/xrdp-devel/files/patch-issue-910
Comment 7 Luca Pizzamiglio 2017-11-15 10:29:04 UTC
Committed. Thanks! I have a couple of hints: * I suggest you to use ports-mgmt/portlint to verify the port before to submit the patch (I changed a blank with a tab, it was just a warning). It's no mandatory, but it's really a useful tool. * in this PR I used the maintainer-feeback flag (set to ?) to request your feedback. When the maintainer reply, he/she should set the flag to '+' , to avoid maintainer timeout. Thanks again for you contribution