Summary: | net/xrdp-devel: Update to 0.9.4 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Koichiro Iwao <meta> | ||||||||||||
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Luca Pizzamiglio <pizzamig> | ||||||||||||
Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||||||||||
Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | meta, pizzamig | ||||||||||||
Priority: | --- | Flags: | pizzamig:
maintainer-feedback?
(meta) |
||||||||||||
Version: | Latest | ||||||||||||||
Hardware: | Any | ||||||||||||||
OS: | Any | ||||||||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Koichiro Iwao
2017-11-08 07:33:21 UTC
Created attachment 187988 [details]
build failure log
The build fails on all supported FreeBSD versions.
The build log is attached.
It looks to me that the patch-issue-730 is the problem (the missing symbol is used there).
Created attachment 187989 [details]
patch
I've updated patch-issue-730.
Created attachment 187990 [details]
patch
The previous pach was invalid. Fixed patch again.
It passed certainly poudriere build.
The current patch is still invalid, it just deletes files like Makefile and distinfo. Created attachment 187992 [details]
patch
Oops, sorry. Patch again.
A commit references this bug: Author: pizzamig Date: Wed Nov 15 10:16:18 UTC 2017 New revision: 454230 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/454230 Log: net/xrdp-devel: Update to 0.9.4 PR: 223512 Submitted by: meta+ports@vmeta.jp (maintainer) Approved by: olivier (mentor) Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D13097 Changes: head/net/xrdp-devel/Makefile head/net/xrdp-devel/distinfo head/net/xrdp-devel/files/patch-configure.ac head/net/xrdp-devel/files/patch-issue-730 head/net/xrdp-devel/files/patch-issue-910 Committed. Thanks! I have a couple of hints: * I suggest you to use ports-mgmt/portlint to verify the port before to submit the patch (I changed a blank with a tab, it was just a warning). It's no mandatory, but it's really a useful tool. * in this PR I used the maintainer-feeback flag (set to ?) to request your feedback. When the maintainer reply, he/she should set the flag to '+' , to avoid maintainer timeout. Thanks again for you contribution |