Bug 225009
| Summary: | www/rubygem-scrapi: update to 2.0.0 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Steve Wills <swills> | ||||
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | freebsd-ports-bugs (Nobody) <ports-bugs> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | don | ||||
| Priority: | --- | Flags: | bugzilla:
maintainer-feedback?
(don) |
||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
(In reply to Steve Wills from comment #0) Thank you for the patch. I accept this patch. And, unfortunately, I have not used this gem recently... Since you don't use it and it's not maintained upstream, I propose we instead mark it DEPRECATED and set an EXPIRATION_DATE. What do you think? (In reply to Steve Wills from comment #2) I approve with your proposal. A commit references this bug: Author: swills Date: Wed Jan 10 17:15:10 UTC 2018 New revision: 458662 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/458662 Log: www/rubygem-scrapi: Mark deprecated No longer maintained upstream PR: 225009 Approved by: don@na.rim.or.jp (maintainer) Changes: head/www/rubygem-scrapi/Makefile Done. Perhaps textproc/rubygem-tidy should go as well. Do you agree? Are there any others that should go? (In reply to Steve Wills from comment #5) Yes, I agree. A commit references this bug: Author: swills Date: Fri Jan 12 14:53:16 UTC 2018 New revision: 458852 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/458852 Log: textproc/rubygem-tidy: mark deprecated PR: 225009 Approved by: don@na.rim.or.jp (maintainer) Changes: head/textproc/rubygem-tidy/Makefile Committed, thanks! |
Created attachment 189532 [details] patch to update www/rubygem-scrapi to 2.0.0 Please see attached patch. Note that textproc/rubygem-tidy_ffi has been created so this should be OK, but does need testing and confirmation that the port is still useful given that it seems to no longer be maintained upstream. (If you use it, you may considering taking over maintenance upstream, the original developer is looking for a new maintainer.)