Bug 225750

Summary: security/softether-devel: add unlock regional lockout option
Product: Ports & Packages Reporter: Koichiro Iwao <meta>
Component: Individual Port(s)Assignee: Koichiro Iwao <meta>
Status: Closed FIXED    
Severity: Affects Only Me CC: meta, pi
Priority: --- Flags: pi: maintainer-feedback-
Version: Latest   
Hardware: Any   
OS: Any   
See Also: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225751
Attachments:
Description Flags
patch none

Description Koichiro Iwao freebsd_committer 2018-02-08 08:29:54 UTC
Created attachment 190418 [details]
patch

SoftEther open source version restricts use of these functions in Japan and China. This patch unlocks them.

- RADIUS / NT Domain user authentication function
- RSA certificate user authentication function
- Deep-inspect packet logging function
- Source IP address control list function
- syslog transfer function
Comment 1 Koichiro Iwao freebsd_committer 2018-07-25 00:48:06 UTC
pi@, may I commit this due to maintainer timeout? The same patch already has been commited to security/softether. To be consistent, the same patch should be applied to both ports.
Comment 2 Kurt Jaeger freebsd_committer 2018-07-25 18:56:07 UTC
Yes, approved.
Comment 3 commit-hook freebsd_committer 2018-07-26 01:04:39 UTC
A commit references this bug:

Author: meta
Date: Thu Jul 26 01:03:41 UTC 2018
New revision: 475341
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/475341

Log:
  security/softether-devel: add unlock regional lockout option

  As well as r462449, applying the same patch to -devel port.

  PR:		225750
  Submitted by:	myself
  Approved by:	maintainer timeout, pi (mentor)

Changes:
  head/security/softether-devel/Makefile
  head/security/softether-devel/files/extra-patch-unrestrict-enterprise-functions
Comment 4 Koichiro Iwao freebsd_committer 2018-07-26 01:15:06 UTC
BTW, off-topic, security/softether is now newer than security/softether-devel. 
hrs@ said he's considering merging these ports into one [1]. Isn't it the time to do that now?

[1] https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2018-February/112671.html
Comment 5 Kurt Jaeger freebsd_committer 2018-07-26 01:19:36 UTC
I have not looked at the difference between the basic and devel port. But removal of the devel variant should be considered if the features can be merged.
Comment 6 Koichiro Iwao freebsd_committer 2018-07-26 01:48:09 UTC
Or keeping -devel port newer than basic port is another option.

At least IGNORE should be set until -devel port become newer than basic port again. People should expect -devel port is a newer develop snapshot than basic.
Comment 7 Koichiro Iwao freebsd_committer 2018-07-26 07:41:23 UTC
Created bug 230050 to update -devel port.