Bug 22656
| Summary: | port update to correct mail/exmh2 support of security/pgp5 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | tweten <tweten> |
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Bruce A. Mah <bmah> |
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | Latest | ||
| Hardware: | Any | ||
| OS: | Any | ||
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports->bmah My port. State Changed From-To: open->feedback Finally got around to looking at this. Patch has been applied to both the FreeBSD port and the CVS repository. Thanks for submitting this, if it works for you now, I'll close the PR. State Changed From-To: feedback->closed Dave Tweten <tweten@nas.nasa.gov> writes: > It's all fixed now, and exmh > seems to be working properly too. |
One problem from my previous PR, ports/21437 remains: "Exmh will not use pgpv to check a Multipart/MIME Clear signature. Since the call to pgpv is in batch mode, there is nobody to ask if the user would like to overwrite /dev/null. (!)" Fix: The fix required hasn't changed from ports/21437 either: "Make batch mode PGP 5.0i calls use the "+force" option, thereby eliminating the dubious need to request confirmation for overwriting /dev/null." The patch to do that follows: --- lib/pgpPgp5.tcl.orig Wed Apr 19 09:54:14 2000 +++ lib/pgpPgp5.tcl Mon Nov 6 17:53:46 2000 @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ ############# # Exec_Batch # Batchmode flags -set pgp(pgp5,flags_batch) {+armorlines=0 +batchmode=on +verbose=0} +set pgp(pgp5,flags_batch) {+armorlines=0 +batchmode=on +force +verbose=0} # proc Pgp_pgp5_PassFdSet {} { global env How-To-Repeat: Send yourself a message with any kind of clear signature. Attempt to read it. Exmh will refuse with an error message mentioning "+force".