Bug 227578
| Summary: | [NEW PORT] devel/sope4 : dependency for new major version branch of www/sogo[2,3] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Euan Thoms <euan> | ||||
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Kurt Jaeger <pi> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Some People | CC: | pi | ||||
| Priority: | --- | Flags: | euan:
maintainer-feedback+
|
||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Bug Depends on: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 227579 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
I forgot to mention, please give credit to Martin, whom emailed me the new port shar. I just checked it and made small fixes to pass portlint etc. The commit should mention: Submitted by: Martin Waschbusch <martin waschbuesch de> Approved by: Euan Thoms <euan potensol com> (maintainer) sope4 was already committed with https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/2018-April/180942.html If it needs an update, can you provide a patch ? If that port is fine, can you give an ACK so that I can close this ? the already-committed devel/sope4, see https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/467854 diff to this version: maintainer line (acm instead of euan) and conflicts syntax So this can be closed. I sent mail to acm asking if euan can take over maintainer for this port. |
Created attachment 192588 [details] New port via svn diff patch There is a new major version branch of SOGo (Groupware / webmail). It's a natural evolutionary progression of www/sogo3 and is compatible with earlier versions (including www/sogo2). In fact, they can co-exist (on seperate jails for example). The older v2 and v3 branches become legacy and continue to get maintenance versions. TESTING ======= DEVELOPER=yes make : PASS + warnings (known stage-qa issues) portlint -AC : PASS make check-plist (default options) : PASS make check-plist (all options disabled) : PASS make check-plist (all options enabled) : PASS poudriere build : PASS Production testing: ------------------- Been running in production on one server for 10 mins minimal basic testing. It all looks good so far.