Summary: | x11-toolkits/wlc: remove port | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Jan Beich <jbeich> |
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | freebsd-x11 (Nobody) <x11> |
Status: | Closed FIXED | ||
Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | johalun0, rene, zeising |
Priority: | --- | Flags: | bugzilla:
maintainer-feedback?
(x11) |
Version: | Latest | ||
Hardware: | Any | ||
OS: | Any |
Description
Jan Beich
2018-10-28 19:21:21 UTC
A commit references this bug: Author: zeising Date: Sun Oct 28 20:35:27 UTC 2018 New revision: 483353 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/483353 Log: x11-toolkits/wlc: Mark as deprecated x11-toolkits/wlc has been deprecated upstream, deprecate it in the ports tree and set expiration date. https://github.com/Cloudef/wlc/commit/6e2c49bf5789115bf33873f3e0ebe603c8e7725d PR: 232767 Reported by: jbeich Changes: head/x11-toolkits/wlc/Makefile Port has been marked as deprecated, removal is slated for slightly over two months, to give any users the chance to move away. This will be replaced by wlroots as a backend to Sway. A Sway port was done but never committed so there are users outside the tree. When we get to doing all the Wayland stuff, let's also get wlroots and sway into ports and remove this one. All Wayland related ports are still early alpha stage so don't rush into any conclusions. (In reply to Johannes Lundberg from comment #3) > A Sway port was done but never committed so there are users outside the tree. Do you mean review D13431? It depends on bug 224202 which you've abandoned. If there's no plan to land it then the port has no users in the current shape. External repositories like the one Greg V maintains can revert removal or update Sway port to a version that depends on wlroots. > When we get to doing all the Wayland stuff, let's also get wlroots and sway > into ports and remove this one. Bug 227509 tries to avoid bitrot. Either stuff is maintained or purged from the tree. Wayland compositors are outside of scope there and may lead to inflow of Wayland-related bug reports which x11@ cannot handle yet. OTOH, an option enabled by default can still be disabled by users that care about the number of dependencies. > All Wayland related ports are still early alpha stage so don't rush into any > conclusions. Why not work in parallel? For one, I want the headache of support of non-default options gone from my ports. For my part, all wayland stuff has been put on ice until we have wayland enabled in ports by default. That's what a lot of things depend on. Expired port removed. wlroots was added in ports r489493. |