Bug 23365
| Summary: | patch Makefile is missing $FreeBSD$ | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Base System | Reporter: | clefevre <clefevre> | ||||
| Component: | gnu | Assignee: | freebsd-bugs (Nobody) <bugs> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||
| Priority: | Normal | ||||||
| Version: | 4.2-STABLE | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
clefevre
2000-12-07 22:40:01 UTC
On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 11:36:33PM +0100, Cyrille.Lefevre wrote: > >Number: 23365 > >Category: gnu > >Synopsis: patch Makefile is missing $FreeBSD$ > >Originator: Cyrille Lefevre [snip] > > >Description: > > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/patch/Makefile is missing $FreeBSD$ If somebody decides to do anything about this - is there a reason that the patch in the base system is still at 2.1? Yes, I know there is a 2.5 port, and I'm using it, and it fixes a lot of weirdness with 2.1, e.g. in dealing with newly created/removed files. G'luck, Peter -- This sentence was in the past tense. please (read sorry), forget this PR #23365 (read close). I made a new one which fixe all Makefiles this way in src/gnu. see http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=23367 Cyrille. -- home: mailto:clefevre@citeweb.net work: mailto:Cyrille.Lefevre@edf.fr State Changed From-To: open->closed Closed at originators request. |
