Bug 234059
| Summary: | misc/kdeutils: Add OPTIONS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Ivan <bsd> | ||||
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | freebsd-kde (group) <kde> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Some People | CC: | adridg, tcberner | ||||
| Priority: | --- | Keywords: | needs-qa | ||||
| Version: | Latest | Flags: | tcberner:
maintainer-feedback+
|
||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
Moin moin If you don't want the meta-port, don't install the metaport... So, I'm not sure if adding options to a pure dependency port is sensible, but I will think on it :) mfg Tobias Hello, I thought this is why metaports exits - to collect similar stuff and allow user to choose what he or she wants. Some other KDE metaports have such options. BTW, base apps could have options too, for example, konqueror is half broken and who cares about helpcenter. A commit references this bug: Author: adridg Date: Wed Dec 19 14:53:54 UTC 2018 New revision: 487800 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/487800 Log: Add OPTIONS to misc/kdeutils. Like, say, graphics/kdegraphics, this is a metaport where all the dependency ports may be considered optional. Add options to allow selecting all the bits. By default, select all of them. Bump PORTREVISION because the PHB says that changes applying to non-default options also count -- although that seems a bit sketchy here. PR: 234059 Submitted by: bsd@abinet.ru Reported by: bsd@abinet.ru Changes: head/misc/kdeutils/Makefile Applied, thanks! (with some changes to the port descriptions -- "for KDE" is something we no longer try to add all over the place, since the applications work fine everywhere) |
Created attachment 200151 [details] kdeutils patch Usually all utilities are not needed and kgpg pulls PIM stuff I don't use. Let's add some options to this metaport :P