Summary: | upgrade devel/jech-dht to 0.26 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Mikhail Teterin <mi> | ||||
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Alexandre C. Guimarães <rigoletto> | ||||
Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | freebsd-2024 | ||||
Priority: | --- | Flags: | bugzilla:
maintainer-feedback?
(freebsd-2024) |
||||
Version: | Latest | ||||||
Hardware: | Any | ||||||
OS: | Any | ||||||
URL: | https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19820 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Hi. I was planning to update devel/jech-dht to 0.26 tomorrow. ^^ Sure I will look into it (tomorrow its late in here), and yes would be a good idea for me to also keep jech-dht to have some control when it break transmission. Thanks! Transmission upstream is supposedly to be working on a fix for that. I think it is a better idea to wait for them. In the meaning time I will be preparing the transmission ports to the upcoming v3.00 which seems will not take longer. Btw, I did a local fix reverting the `dht_callback` -> `dht_callback_t`, and it works; however it is not a proper fix for ports. ^^ Thank you. A commit references this bug: Author: rigoletto Date: Fri Apr 5 06:26:50 UTC 2019 New revision: 497937 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/497937 Log: devel/jech-dht: Update to 0.26. PR: 234515 Submitted by: mi Reviewed by: mat (mentor) Approved by: tcberner (mentor) Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19820 Changes: head/devel/jech-dht/Makefile head/devel/jech-dht/distinfo head/devel/jech-dht/files/BSDmakefile head/devel/jech-dht/files/patch-warns |
Created attachment 200637 [details] Upgrade to 0.26 Just as we upgraded from 0.22 to 0.25, a new release is with the following items in changelog: 16 December 2018: dht-0.26 * Fixed a bug introduced in 0.25 that prevented replying to find_nodes when want was not set. * Rename dht_callback to dht_callback_t. This is an incompatible change. Transmission-daemon failed to link (dht_sendto() unknown) -- rigoletto@, could you, please, look into it? Thank you! (P.S. Would you like to take over maintainership, maybe?)