Bug 237162
| Summary: | devel/hwloc : Update to 1.11.12 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | wen <wenheping2000> | ||||||||
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Wen Heping <wen> | ||||||||
| Status: | Closed Overcome By Events | ||||||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | phd_kimberlite, w.schwarzenfeld | ||||||||
| Priority: | --- | Flags: | phd_kimberlite:
maintainer-feedback+
|
||||||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||
Hi, maintainer: Now there is hwloc2, we shall repocopy it from hwloc, we have 2 selects: 1 repocopy hwloc --> hwloc1 and update hwloc to 2.0.1 2 repocopy hwloc --> hwloc2 and keep hwloc as now I suggest we select way 2, beacause many ports which depends on hwloc1 could not build with hwloc2, if we select way 1 we shall make big changes to ports tree. How do you think about it ? Regards, wen (In reply to wen from comment #1) Thank you for your suggestion. I agree with your plan-2. Regards, Original report: bug 231844 Reporter is committer, assign accordingly ping! Created attachment 208475 [details]
hwloc 1.11.13
Hi,
I've created hwloc 1.11.13 update.
Created attachment 208476 [details]
hwloc 2.0.3
The attached is hwloc 2.0.4 port.
However this port conflicts with hwoloc 1.11.13 (installs files into the same place).
Currently I don't have enough time to fix it.
Superceded by 249479. |
Created attachment 203543 [details] - Update to 1.11.12 - Update to 1.11.12 (so many port depends on devel/hwloc, shall we ask for a exp-run for it ?)