|Summary:||devel/hwloc : Update to 1.11.12|
|Product:||Ports & Packages||Reporter:||wen <wenheping2000>|
|Component:||Individual Port(s)||Assignee:||Wen Heping <wen>|
|Status:||Closed Overcome By Events|
|Severity:||Affects Only Me||CC:||phd_kimberlite, w.schwarzenfeld|
Description wen 2019-04-09 12:49:50 UTC
Created attachment 203543 [details] - Update to 1.11.12 - Update to 1.11.12 (so many port depends on devel/hwloc, shall we ask for a exp-run for it ?)
Comment 1 wen 2019-04-09 12:54:57 UTC
Hi, maintainer: Now there is hwloc2, we shall repocopy it from hwloc, we have 2 selects: 1 repocopy hwloc --> hwloc1 and update hwloc to 2.0.1 2 repocopy hwloc --> hwloc2 and keep hwloc as now I suggest we select way 2, beacause many ports which depends on hwloc1 could not build with hwloc2, if we select way 1 we shall make big changes to ports tree. How do you think about it ? Regards, wen
Comment 2 Eijiro Shibusawa 2019-04-13 22:54:23 UTC
(In reply to wen from comment #1) Thank you for your suggestion. I agree with your plan-2. Regards,
Comment 3 Kubilay Kocak 2019-04-14 06:45:57 UTC
Original report: bug 231844 Reporter is committer, assign accordingly
Comment 4 Walter Schwarzenfeld 2019-08-15 08:18:17 UTC
Comment 5 Eijiro Shibusawa 2019-10-21 02:01:22 UTC
Created attachment 208475 [details] hwloc 1.11.13 Hi, I've created hwloc 1.11.13 update.
Comment 6 Eijiro Shibusawa 2019-10-21 02:05:06 UTC
Created attachment 208476 [details] hwloc 2.0.3 The attached is hwloc 2.0.4 port. However this port conflicts with hwoloc 1.11.13 (installs files into the same place). Currently I don't have enough time to fix it.
Comment 7 Wen Heping 2020-10-05 00:31:47 UTC
Superceded by 249479.