Summary: | www/cliqz: files/patch-bug1559213 is unused | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Jan Beich <jbeich> |
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Jan Beich <jbeich> |
Status: | Closed FIXED | ||
Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | santhosh.raju |
Priority: | --- | Keywords: | needs-patch |
Version: | Latest | Flags: | santhosh.raju:
maintainer-feedback+
|
Hardware: | Any | ||
OS: | Any | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238410 |
Description
Jan Beich
![]() ![]() (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #0) Looking at Cliqz's configuration it seems you are right. I have asked a Cliqz developer to confirm it. I agree with you, if there are no switches that make use of the patch it should be removed. Thank you for pointing this out. Open issue cant block a closed issue, add to See Also instead ^Triage: Reporter is committer, assign accordingly (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #2) > Open issue cant block a closed issue, add to See Also instead That's how regressions were tracked[1] on bugzilla.mozilla.org until they've introduced a separate field to avoid ambiguity. See also bug 203179. [1] https://mozilla.github.io/bug-handling/regressions A commit references this bug: Author: jbeich Date: Mon Jul 1 15:54:42 UTC 2019 New revision: 505609 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/505609 Log: www/cliqz: drop patch accidentally copied from www/firefox This port doesn't use --with-system-av1, so keeping the patch would only introduce unnecessary churn on updates. PR: 238899 Approved by: Santhosh Raju (maintainer, implicit) Changes: head/www/cliqz/files/patch-bug1559213 |