| Summary: | mount_smbfs man page should say that it only supports SMB1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Documentation | Reporter: | Sean McBride <sean> |
| Component: | Books & Articles | Assignee: | Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp> |
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||
| Severity: | Affects Many People | CC: | 0mp, bcr |
| Priority: | --- | Flags: | 0mp:
mfc-stable12?
0mp: mfc-stable11? |
| Version: | Latest | ||
| Hardware: | Any | ||
| OS: | Any | ||
|
Description
Sean McBride
2019-09-09 20:13:59 UTC
This has been recently documented in 13.0-CURRENT: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=339990 Maybe we could MFC that. What is the status of the MFC? If we decide not to MFC it, I think we can close this PR. Pardon my ignorance, but what is MFC? MFC means merging from the CURRENT branch to STABLE branches. Benedict, I'll submit a diff to phabricator in a couple of days. So is mount_smbfs basically abandonware? Looking through your doc change, I searched ports, and I guess samba is the thing to install? (In reply to Sean McBride from comment #6) I've summed up what I know in this wiki article: https://wiki.freebsd.org/MateuszPiotrowski/AccessingSmbSharesWithSambaClient Yes, mount_smbfs is somewhat outdated. MFC'd into 12-STABLE in r358917. |