Summary: | zfs send -n -P -i is broken after r344601 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Base System | Reporter: | Andriy Gapon <avg> | ||||
Component: | bin | Assignee: | Sean Eric Fagan <sef> | ||||
Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
Severity: | Affects Some People | CC: | driesm, emaste, fs, markj, mav, re | ||||
Priority: | --- | Keywords: | regression | ||||
Version: | 12.0-RELEASE | Flags: | koobs:
mfc-stable12?
|
||||
Hardware: | Any | ||||||
OS: | Any | ||||||
URL: | https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21709 | ||||||
Bug Depends on: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 240700 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Andriy Gapon
2019-09-17 11:29:27 UTC
This is a potential blocker for 12.1 release as this is a regression since 12.0. Proposed patch in https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21709. If I don't get more feedback from it by tomorrow, I'll commit it over the weekend, and MFC 2 weeks after that, unless things need to move faster. For any issues added as a bug 240700 blocker, please either include the patch as an attachment with maintainer-approval flag set to ? re@, or add re@ as a blocking reviewer on the differential For the review, re@ doesn't work; releng? Created attachment 207644 [details]
Proposed patch
Proposed diff, as per request.
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #3) As mentioned in (many) emails to developers, re@ does not currently accept Phabricator reviews for approval requests. Please see https://wiki.freebsd.org/Releng/ChangeRequestGuidelines for the procedures. (In reply to Glen Barber from comment #6) Well, this is not a merge request (yet). The fix is not even in head. I am sure that when the time comes to merge from stable/12 to releng/12.1, there will be a proper approval request. I am not sure why there are some many requirements and requests to sef at *this* stage. (In reply to Andriy Gapon from comment #7) I misunderstood the context of the PR. I apologize for the confusion. A commit references this bug: Author: sef Date: Sat Sep 21 17:54:42 UTC 2019 New revision: 352580 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/352580 Log: Fix a regression introduced in r344601, and work properly with the -v and -n options. PR: 240640 Reported by: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed by: avg MFC after: 2 weeks Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21709 Changes: head/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzfs/common/libzfs_sendrecv.c Sean, is it possible to MFC this change to stable/12 a little bit sooner, so that we can try to merge it to releng/12.1 while it's still in the RC phase? Thanks! (In reply to Andriy Gapon from comment #10) Sorry, I meant beta phase, of course. I completely forgot about it this weekend. I'll plan on doing things today. A commit references this bug: Author: sef Date: Tue Oct 1 18:05:52 UTC 2019 New revision: 352932 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/352932 Log: Fix a regression introduced in r344601, and work properly with the -v and -n options. PR: 240640 Reported by: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed by: avg Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21709 Approved by: re Changes: releng/12.1/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzfs/common/libzfs_sendrecv.c Can this PR be closed? A commit references this bug: Author: avg Date: Wed Oct 9 09:47:00 UTC 2019 New revision: 353338 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/353338 Log: MFC r352580 by sef: Fix a regression introduced in r344601 ... and work properly with the -v and -n options. PR: 240640 Changes: _U stable/11/ stable/11/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzfs/common/libzfs_sendrecv.c (In reply to Mark Johnston from comment #14) Yes, of course. Let me do it now. |