Bug 243702
| Summary: | security/vuxml: Add January FreeBSD Security Advisories SA-20:01.libfetch, SA-20:02.ipsec and SA-20:03.thrmisc | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd> | ||||
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Security Team <secteam> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Many People | CC: | philip, ports-secteam | ||||
| Priority: | --- | Keywords: | needs-qa, security | ||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
2 weeks passed and again - nobody cares. A commit references this bug: Author: philip Date: Fri Feb 14 01:16:13 UTC 2020 New revision: 526079 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/526079 Log: security/vuxml: Add January FreeBSD SAs SA-20:01.libfetch SA-20:02.ipsec SA-20:03.thrmisc PR: 243702 Submitted by: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Changes: head/security/vuxml/vuln.xml (In reply to Miroslav Lachman from comment #1) We care. The security-officer checklist to release security advisories is not perfect. Work is ongoing to improve this. Thank you for your submission and for keeping our feet close to the fire. Apologies for the delay. Again. (In reply to Philip Paeps from comment #3) I know everybody here is volunteer and has just a bit of time for FreeBSD. But 2 weeks to publish information about critical security advisories is a way too much time. If there is anything I can help with to improve the situation with SO checklist please let me know. Thank you for committing! |
Created attachment 211160 [details] vuln.xml patch with SAs FreeBSD SA entries Add new FreeBSD SA entries in to vuln.xml Port security/base-audit depends on SA entries in vuln.xml. Pleases commit this soon.