Summary: | security/i2p pkg, remove or rebuild *with* docs. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Chris Watson <bsdunix44> |
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Bernhard Froehlich <decke> |
Status: | Closed Overcome By Events | ||
Severity: | Affects Many People | CC: | decke, linimon, m.muenz, woodsb02 |
Priority: | --- | ||
Version: | Latest | ||
Hardware: | amd64 | ||
OS: | Any |
Description
Chris Watson
2020-03-29 23:51:31 UTC
> How did this ever get committed? It takes some detective work (it has been renamed at least twice) but the initial commit seems to be: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/net/i2p/Makefile?view=markup&pathrev=126099 15 years 2 months is a little bit too long ago go back and assign blame. (Yes, you are reading me as being a bit irritated by your tone. The port is now unmaintained, which means that it won't be fixed until someone takes an interest in doing so.) I'm not looking for blame, certainly not to you. I'm looking for this to be removed. I knew lioux. But that was a long time ago and also irrelevant. I'm not sure what the port did back then. The port currently has a "DOCS=YES|NO" option. So it *can* build with docs. Not only does the pkg not build with docs, the pkg is devoid of any information. It doesn't even run properly as shown above. It's been fifteen years, and there is no way I am the only one to install this, see how broken it is, and remove it. Running across stuff like this is like browsing the bug database and seeing open bugs 15 years old *still* not closed. It's *frustrating*. I keep bumping into several ports that are unmaintained. UGH. Ill take a closer look at those. I'm currently looking at this port. Maybe I'll take over maintainership and add some package notes and sample configs. I already brought it to the latest version but Makefile needs some tuning. Port will be in a better state as soon as PR 245656 is committed. Thanks! |