Bug 247686
| Summary: | [NEW PORT] devel/py-class-registry: Factory+Registry pattern for Python classes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | waitman | ||||
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | freebsd-ports-bugs (Nobody) <ports-bugs> | ||||
| Status: | Open --- | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | PopularMoment, lwhsu, python, robak, swills, waitman | ||||
| Priority: | --- | Keywords: | feature, needs-qa | ||||
| Version: | Latest | Flags: | koobs:
maintainer-feedback?
(waitman) |
||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Bug Depends on: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 247687 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
Please list yourself in the MAINTAINER filed. Thanks! Update COMMENT to match setup.py:description (modulo portlint compliance): "Factory+Registry pattern for Python classes" This should probably be called py-class-registry2 as there are 2.x [1] and a 3.x [3] branches from the same project [3] but it's incompatible with at least B2 [4], which is the initial use case. Also note the 3.x branch dropped 2.7 support. [1] https://pypi.org/project/class-registry/ [2] https://pypi.org/project/phx-class-registry/ [3] https://github.com/todofixthis/class-registry/tags [4] https://github.com/Backblaze/B2_Command_Line_Tool/blob/49a29b6d786e68db58ff8303c718fdab9d43eaaa/requirements.txt#L4 Would you want to be a maintainer of this port? I'm happy to commit it to get the b2 port over the line, but you need to take on maintainership of this submission or find a maintainer for it. |
Created attachment 216103 [details] devel/py-class-registry 2.1.2 needed for devel/py-b2 2.0.0