Summary: | databases/db6: Update to 6.2.38 and undeprecate | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Yasuhiro Kimura <yasu> | ||||
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Matthias Andree <mandree> | ||||
Status: | Closed Overcome By Events | ||||||
Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | lcook | ||||
Priority: | --- | Keywords: | needs-qa | ||||
Version: | Latest | Flags: | mandree:
maintainer-feedback+
|
||||
Hardware: | Any | ||||||
OS: | Any | ||||||
URL: | https://raw.githubusercontent.com/yasuhirokimura/db6/2fc23c7bb1b58773635c2b0445057ac476d28e4e/dist/ChangeLog | ||||||
See Also: | https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248415 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
^Triage: - If there is a changelog or release notes URL available for this version, please add it to the URL field - Please confirm this change passes QA (portlint, poudriere at least). For details and instructions, see: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/testing.html (In reply to Lewis Cook from comment #1) Poudriere build log: https://www.utahime.org/FreeBSD/poudriere/data/logs/bulk/121amd64-test/2020-07-24_00h07m15s/logs/db6-6.2.32_1.log Dear Yasuhiro-san, I'd prefer if we then moved to a new db18 port instead, but I am not interested in maintaining it. Oracle are not responding to support inquiries and making it hard for distributors, I have no interest in putting up with that reclusive behavior. Let's just have db6 expire, and you can add a devel/db18 port if you are willing to maintain one. Can I close this PR then? ^ databases/db18 of course |
Created attachment 216702 [details] Patch file * Update to 6.2.38 and undeprecate. * Change MASTER_SITES to my personal copy on GitHub.