Bug 249082

Summary: net-im/sshout: update to 1.2.0
Product: Ports & Packages Reporter: WHR <msl0000023508>
Component: Individual Port(s)Assignee: Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu>
Status: Closed FIXED    
Severity: Affects Only Me CC: fernape, lwhsu, msl0000023508
Priority: ---    
Version: Latest   
Hardware: Any   
OS: Any   
Attachments:
Description Flags
ports.net-im.sshout-1.2.0-with-xclip-optional-dependency.diff msl0000023508: maintainer-approval+

Description WHR 2020-09-03 17:00:21 UTC 
Please see my previous report #245734 for my optional dependencies question.

Is it OK to declare the optional dependencies (suggested ports) in port options? If not I will need to move it into pkg-message instead.
Comment 1 WHR 2020-09-03 17:02:56 UTC 
Created attachment 217721 [details]
ports.net-im.sshout-1.2.0-with-xclip-optional-dependency.diff

Update with xclip optional dependency as a port option.
Comment 2 WHR 2020-09-03 17:05:58 UTC 
Please see my previous bug #245734 for my optional dependencies question.
Comment 3 Fernando Apesteguía freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2020-09-03 18:21:35 UTC 
^Triage: If there is a changelog or release notes URL available for this version, please add it to the URL field.

^Triage: Please set the maintainer-approval attachment flag (to +) on patches for ports you maintain to signify approval.
--
Attachment -> Details -> maintainer-approval [+]
Comment 4 Li-Wen Hsu freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2020-09-08 09:30:37 UTC 
(In reply to WHR from comment #0)
It's fine to add dependencies based on the option value.
Comment 5 commit-hook freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2020-09-08 09:34:36 UTC 
A commit references this bug:

Author: lwhsu
Date: Tue Sep  8 09:33:55 UTC 2020
New revision: 547975
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/547975

Log:
  net-im/sshout: Update to 1.2.0

  PR:		249082
  Submitted by:	WHR <msl0000023508@gmail.com> (maintainer)

Changes:
  head/net-im/sshout/Makefile
  head/net-im/sshout/distinfo
  head/net-im/sshout/pkg-message
  head/net-im/sshout/pkg-plist