Bug 249310

Summary: graphics/mesa-demos: avoid conflict with glx-utils
Product: Ports & Packages Reporter: Jan Beich <jbeich>
Component: Individual Port(s)Assignee: freebsd-x11 (Nobody) <x11>
Status: Closed Not Accepted    
Severity: Affects Only Me CC: Alexander88207, lcook, manu, portmaster, se, tcberner
Priority: --- Keywords: patch
Version: LatestFlags: manu: maintainer-feedback-
jbeich: maintainer-feedback? (se)
Alexander88207: maintainer-feedback+
lcook: maintainer-feedback+
portmaster: maintainer-feedback+
Hardware: Any   
OS: Any   
See Also: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26077
Attachments:
Description Flags
v1 none

Description Jan Beich freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2020-09-14 13:14:32 UTC 
Created attachment 217951 [details]
v1

- Add _demo suffix similar to bitmap_demo. Inspired by https://github.com/netbsd/pkgsrc/commit/b3c2d76226ac
- glxinfo has consumers, so switch to glx-utils instead of patching to support glxinfo_demo
Comment 1 Alexander Vereeken 2020-09-14 13:50:18 UTC 
Would then switch to glx-utils then.
Comment 2 Jan Beich freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2020-12-23 20:22:20 UTC 
Ping to x11@. I can switch consumers while keeping CONFLICTS but some users may want other demos e.g., eglinfo, eglgears_x11, glxgears_pixmap.
Comment 3 Emmanuel Vadot freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2020-12-30 15:08:19 UTC 
NAK.
You cannot add a ports that install the same binaries as another one and then changing the name of the binaries of the historical port.
Again doing that kind of stuff without talking to people is very rude.
Never the less I think that depending on mesa-demos for a ports is wrong and instead people should just use the language of their choice to query the opengl info they want. If they really insist for having glxinfo, let them depend on mesa-demos.