|Summary:||mail/fetchmail & mail/fetchmailconf: Update to 6.4.14|
|Product:||Ports & Packages||Reporter:||Neel Chauhan <nc>|
|Component:||Individual Port(s)||Assignee:||Juraj Lutter <otis>|
|Severity:||Affects Only Me||CC:||chalpin, otis|
Description Neel Chauhan 2020-12-20 05:53:58 UTC
Created attachment 220735 [details] Patch (Revision 1) Both pass poudriere.
Comment 1 Juraj Lutter 2020-12-20 16:01:22 UTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D27689
Comment 2 Juraj Lutter 2020-12-20 16:02:55 UTC
(In reply to Neel Chauhan from comment #0) 1. Waiting for maintainer (maintainer timeout is 2 weeks) 2. Please, submit patches with context (see https://wiki.freebsd.org/Phabricator)
Comment 3 Corey Halpin 2020-12-28 01:12:47 UTC
Looks good to me. No new warnings from `portlint`. mail/fetchmail passes 'poudriere testport' on both i386 and amd64 under 11.4 and 12.1 for the following configurations: - Default settings - Default settings, build as non-root - ssl=base, GSSAPI_MIT - ssl=base, GSSAPI_NONE - ssl=openssl - ssl=openssl with SSL2 and SSL3 disabled - ssl=openssl, GSSAPI_NONE - ssl=libressl - ssl=libressl, GSSAPI_NONE mail/fetchmailconf passes 'poudriere testport' on both i386 and amd64 under 11.4 and 12.1 with default settings. Built package works in my testing. I approve this patch. Thank you!
Comment 4 commit-hook 2020-12-28 10:35:55 UTC
A commit references this bug: Author: otis Date: Mon Dec 28 10:35:34 UTC 2020 New revision: 559457 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/559457 Log: mail/fetchmail: Update to 6.4.14 PR: 251979 Submitted by: Neel Chauhan <firstname.lastname@example.org> (maintainer) Reviewed by: osa (mentor) Approved by: osa (mentor) Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D27689 Changes: head/mail/fetchmail/Makefile head/mail/fetchmail/distinfo
Comment 5 Corey Halpin 2020-12-28 15:01:13 UTC
I'm assuming the "(maintainer)" part in the commit message was just a typo? It wasn't my intention in approving this patch to give up maintainership and the actual changeset doesn't appear to modify the MAINTAINER line.
Comment 6 Juraj Lutter 2020-12-28 15:05:57 UTC
You are right, you still are the MAINTAINER. And yes, it was a typo. Sorry for it.