Bug 254150
| Summary: | net-im/tg_owt: mark port broken on 11 with base OpenSSL | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Henry Hu <henry.hu.sh> | ||||
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Lewis Cook <lcook> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | lcook | ||||
| Priority: | --- | ||||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
Poudriere log on 11.4-p8/i386 with openssl from ports: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/HenryHu/ports/master/.logs/11.4-i386/tg_owt-0.0.20210207.log Moin moin, Everything looks good. Only one minor nit as suggested by portclippy[1]: $ portclippy Makefile # PORTNAME block PORTNAME PORTVERSION CATEGORIES # Maintainer block MAINTAINER COMMENT # License block LICENSE LICENSE_FILE # Dependencies BUILD_DEPENDS LIB_DEPENDS # USES block USES USE_GITHUB GH_ACCOUNT GH_PROJECT GH_TAGNAME GH_TUPLE # USES=cmake related variables +CMAKE_OFF # CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS/LDFLAGS block CXXFLAGS -CMAKE_OFF Are you happy with me including this in the commit? [1] https://www.freshports.org/ports-mgmt/portfmt (In reply to Lewis Cook from comment #2) Sure, this looks fine. Maybe I should take a look at this tool. A commit references this bug: Author: lcook Date: Wed Mar 10 14:10:24 UTC 2021 New revision: 568003 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/568003 Log: net-im/tg_owt: Mark port BROKEN on 11 with base OpenSSL While here, pet both portclippy and portfmt. PR: 254150 Submitted by: Henry Hu <henry.hu.sh@gmail.com> (maintainer) Approved by: fernape (mentor) Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D29184 Changes: head/net-im/tg_owt/Makefile Committed, thanks! |
Created attachment 223107 [details] patch to mark it as broken The OpenSSL in base is too old for FreeBSD 11. Mark the port as broken. I've tried DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= ssl=openssl, and this port builds fine, so we don't need to mark it as broken in that case.