| Summary: | csh builtin nice behaves improperly | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Base System | Reporter: | Robert Watson <rwatson> |
| Component: | bin | Assignee: | freebsd-bugs (Nobody) <bugs> |
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | 5.0-CURRENT | ||
| Hardware: | Any | ||
| OS: | Any | ||
|
Description
Robert Watson
2001-02-27 22:40:01 UTC
> > >Number: 25436 > >Category: bin > >Synopsis: csh builtin nice behaves improperly > > However, what does worry me is that the csh nice command doesn't appear to > work properly, and report errors correctly. It works, it just doesn't report errors; it throws away the return value from setpriority(2). I can send patches for this, but that would mean taking off three or four files off the vendor branch. Is tcsh actively maintained? If so, where should patches be submitted to? Anyone? Regards Dima Dorfman dima@unixfreak.org > [ csh builtin nice doesn't check return value of setpriority(2) ] This has been fixed in the tcsh repository by Christos Zoulas. FreeBSD will pick up the change the next time tcsh is imported. Do you want to keep this PR open until then, or should I close it? Thanks Dima Dorfman dima@unixfreak.org Closing it is fine, thanks! Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project robert@fledge.watson.org NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Dima Dorfman wrote: > > [ csh builtin nice doesn't check return value of setpriority(2) ] > > This has been fixed in the tcsh repository by Christos Zoulas. > FreeBSD will pick up the change the next time tcsh is imported. Do > you want to keep this PR open until then, or should I close it? > > Thanks > > Dima Dorfman > dima@unixfreak.org > > State Changed From-To: open->closed Fixed in the tcsh repo; FreeBSD will pick it up with the next update. |