Bug 255044

Summary: net/traefik2: Remove port
Product: Ports & Packages Reporter: Thomas Zander <riggs>
Component: Individual Port(s)Assignee: Thomas Zander <riggs>
Status: Closed FIXED    
Severity: Affects Many People CC: freebsd
Priority: --- Keywords: patch
Version: LatestFlags: freebsd: maintainer-feedback+
Hardware: Any   
OS: Any   
Attachments:
Description Flags
Removal of net/traefik2 none

Description Thomas Zander freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2021-04-14 07:03:17 UTC
net/traefik2 has not been updated for more than a year.
Also net/traefik is on the 2.x branch since 2020Q4.
Comment 1 Thomas Zander freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2021-04-14 07:11:10 UTC
Created attachment 224096 [details]
Removal of net/traefik2
Comment 2 Christopher Beppler 2021-04-14 08:13:47 UTC
Agreed, there is no need for this port anymore.
Comment 3 commit-hook freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2021-04-14 17:28:03 UTC
A commit in branch main references this bug:

URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=795e1c44faabc49b3d013515cbafa6d2afc8b7aa

commit 795e1c44faabc49b3d013515cbafa6d2afc8b7aa
Author:     Thomas Zander <riggs@FreeBSD.org>
AuthorDate: 2021-04-14 07:07:26 +0000
Commit:     Thomas Zander <riggs@FreeBSD.org>
CommitDate: 2021-04-14 17:26:42 +0000

    net/traefik2: Remove port.

    net/traefik2 was tracking the 2.x branch as long as net/traefik was on
    the 1.7.x branch. It has been superseded by the update of net/traefik to
    the 2.x branch in late 2020.

    PR:             255044

 MOVED                                |  1 +
 net/Makefile                         |  1 -
 net/traefik2/Makefile (gone)         | 44 -------------------------------
 net/traefik2/distinfo (gone)         |  3 ---
 net/traefik2/files/traefik.in (gone) | 51 ------------------------------------
 net/traefik2/pkg-descr (gone)        |  6 -----
 net/traefik2/pkg-message (gone)      | 21 ---------------
 7 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 126 deletions(-)
Comment 4 Thomas Zander freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2021-04-14 17:44:29 UTC
(In reply to Christopher Beppler from comment #2)

Thanks for the quick response!