| Summary: | [PATCH] ifconfig support for wireless network cards | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Base System | Reporter: | brooks <brooks> | ||||
| Component: | conf | Assignee: | Poul-Henning Kamp <phk> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||
| Priority: | Normal | ||||||
| Version: | 5.0-CURRENT | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
brooks
2001-03-07 01:50:01 UTC
DAMN! Don't use the patch submitted with this PR on multi-user systems! I realized just after I sent it that there was no suser check on modifying the an setting. Use the patch on my webpage instead: http://www.one-eyed-alien.net/~brooks/FreeBSD/ifconfig.diff -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 I'm working on merging and cleaning up the wi() and an() drivers. I'll integrate this as well. -- Andre On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 03:03:25PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> I'm working on merging and cleaning up the wi() and an() drivers. I'll
> integrate this as well.
You're merging the drivers? Is that actually a reasionable thing to do?
The Cisco cards have a very different programming interface and a
substantialy larger feature set. I know the have the same hardware and
the very bottem but they have entierly unrelated firmware.
-- Brooks
--
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
Brooks Davis wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 03:03:25PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > I'm working on merging and cleaning up the wi() and an() drivers. I'll
> > integrate this as well.
>
> You're merging the drivers? Is that actually a reasionable thing to do?
> The Cisco cards have a very different programming interface and a
> substantialy larger feature set. I know the have the same hardware and
> the very bottem but they have entierly unrelated firmware.
At least the drivers are very similiar and share a lot of the same
base functions.
The question is more of a policy sort. Is it better to have two
similiar drivers or one driver with more conditional code?
--
Andre
Responsible Changed
From-To: freebsd-bugs->phk
I'll adopt this one. It's a good move to get away from ${foo}control
to the extent we can.
State Changed From-To: open->closed Committed, thanks! |