| Summary: | mail/getmail6: fix 6.16 build after upstream distfile changed | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Michael Büker <freebsd> | ||||
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | freebsd-ports-bugs (Nobody) <ports-bugs> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Some People | CC: | jcfyecrayz, jrm, ports-bugs | ||||
| Priority: | --- | ||||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| URL: | https://github.com/getmail6/getmail6/releases/tag/v6.16 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
Has anyone compared the original tarball to the new one? How are they different (after extracting)? I don't have the original tarball to compare with. The issue has been cleared up, it was a harmless mistake by the maintainer: https://github.com/getmail6/getmail6/issues/77 (In reply to Michael Büker from comment #2) I figured it was intentional and minor, but it's always good to verify. It's bad (generously: poor design choice; less generous: outright bug) that git does not support history for tag changes. Thanks for following up. |
Created attachment 224989 [details] portstree patch with new hash (including portrevision bump) The upstream distfile has (for reasons unknown to me, I've contacted upstream to find out) changed in size+hash, breaking the build. This fixes it.