| Summary: | net-im/scli: no longer fetches (Github updates to .tar.gz generator?) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Matthias Andree <mandree> |
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp> |
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||
| Severity: | Affects Many People | CC: | grahamperrin |
| Priority: | --- | Flags: | bugzilla:
maintainer-feedback?
(0mp) |
| Version: | Latest | ||
| Hardware: | Any | ||
| OS: | Any | ||
|
Description
Matthias Andree
2021-10-05 20:51:46 UTC
Thanks for the report. I've asked the upstream about it. See https://github.com/isamert/scli/issues/143. A commit in branch main references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=1421ae7eb67cb994cee5784d97fa313274afa78c commit 1421ae7eb67cb994cee5784d97fa313274afa78c Author: Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@FreeBSD.org> AuthorDate: 2021-10-07 09:59:18 +0000 Commit: Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@FreeBSD.org> CommitDate: 2021-10-07 09:59:18 +0000 net-im/scli: Update distinfo GitHub seemed to regenerate the tarball, which changed its hash and size. The contents are the same. PR: 258955 Reported by: mandree net-im/scli/distinfo | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) A commit in branch 2021Q4 references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=8c778c523fc3f8aceed78507b53c4cc8059a6557 commit 8c778c523fc3f8aceed78507b53c4cc8059a6557 Author: Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@FreeBSD.org> AuthorDate: 2021-10-07 09:59:18 +0000 Commit: Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@FreeBSD.org> CommitDate: 2021-10-07 10:15:19 +0000 net-im/scli: Update distinfo GitHub seemed to regenerate the tarball, which changed its hash and size. The contents are the same. PR: 258955 Reported by: mandree (cherry picked from commit 1421ae7eb67cb994cee5784d97fa313274afa78c) net-im/scli/distinfo | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) When it comes to your second question, I'm not sure if we can avoid this problem if we are relying on autogenerated tarballs. See https://github.com/isamert/scli/issues/143#issuecomment-937595274 |