Summary: | misc/mc: is nox11 variant really necessary? | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Yury V. Zaytsev <yury> |
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe> |
Status: | Closed FIXED | ||
Severity: | Affects Only Me | Flags: | bugzilla:
maintainer-feedback?
(danfe) |
Priority: | --- | ||
Version: | Latest | ||
Hardware: | Any | ||
OS: | Any | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238425 |
Description
Yury V. Zaytsev
2023-01-23 19:58:40 UTC
A commit in branch main references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=a5ade24bb0d77d5ca30a27dc33748ff644a09588 commit a5ade24bb0d77d5ca30a27dc33748ff644a09588 Author: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> AuthorDate: 2024-01-15 10:38:18 +0000 Commit: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> CommitDate: 2024-01-15 10:38:18 +0000 misc/mc: drop needless run-time dependencies on Aspell and Xlib Yury V. Zaytsev points out that for X11 and Aspell support, header files <X11/Xlib.h> and <aspell.h> are only needed during the build, while their corresponding libraries would be loaded dynamically if available; if not, mc(1) would still work fine, just without those features. The source code and ldd(1) output confirm his findings: % cd $WRKDIR/mc-4.8.30 && grep -R -A1 g_module_build_path * lib/tty/x11conn.c: x11_module_fname = g_module_build_path (NULL, "X11"); lib/tty/x11conn.c- x11_module = g_module_open (x11_module_fname, G_MODULE_BIND_LAZY); -- src/editor/spell.c: spell_module_fname = g_module_build_path (NULL, "libaspell"); src/editor/spell.c- spell_module = g_module_open (spell_module_fname, G_MODULE_BIND_LAZY); This allows to enable Aspell support by default and drop X11-less slave port now that both of these dependencies are build-time only yet still can be completely disabled via options. PR: 269120 MOVED | 1 + misc/Makefile | 1 - misc/mc-nox11/Makefile (gone) | 4 ---- misc/mc/Makefile | 11 +++++------ 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) (In reply to Yury V. Zaytsev from comment #0) > [...] useless nox11 variants not having runtime dependency that wasn't > there in the first place... not sure whether FreeBSD has its own reasons > to have a separate port (e.g. allow building on systems without X11 > headers?) Yes, that was the original intention and also because USE_XORG components register both build- and run-time dependencies. I've now converted both to build-time only as you correctly describe, and `mc-nox11' port is not longer needed (those who build from ports can easily disable the option and package users won't even notice it). Hey Alexey, thanks for looking into this! |