Summary: | FreeBSD Handbook: re-write 'Creating a FreeBSD Guest' and 'Using ZFS with bhyve Guests' | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Documentation | Reporter: | Steven Friedrich <Steven.E.Friedrich> |
Component: | Books & Articles | Assignee: | freebsd-doc (Nobody) <doc> |
Status: | Open --- | ||
Severity: | Affects Some People | CC: | freebsd, pat |
Priority: | --- | Keywords: | needs-patch |
Version: | Latest | ||
Hardware: | Any | ||
OS: | Any | ||
URL: | https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-doc/blob/main/documentation/content/en/books/handbook/virtualization/_index.adoc | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263315 |
Description
Steven Friedrich
2023-05-16 11:03:55 UTC
(In reply to Steven Friedrich from comment #0) Hi Steven, do you happen to remember where you read the recommendation on avoiding zvol device nodes? I'm aware it's a bit of a controversial topic, and I too have sometimes seen better performance with file backed storage instead of zvols. We could add a remark that using file backed storage works on zfs just like on ufs? For reference, there was a discussion on the forums a while back: https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/how-to-set-up-storage-for-a-bhyve-hypervisor-zfs-or-ufs-for-host-guest.93383/ Appreciate your feedback - even if it's been a while... thanks cm There’s an article from Klara comparing the performance: https://klarasystems.com/articles/virtualization-showdown-freebsd-bhyve-linux-kvm/ Specifically the section “Finding the most performant storage configuration on bhyve” (In reply to Pat Maddox from comment #2) Well, that settles that then, I guess. We should probably rewrite the advice to use file backed storage on datasets instead of zvols. I'll put that on my todo list. Unless someone beats me to it, I'll look into setting up a review. |