Summary: | textproc/py-CommonMark: rename bin/cmark to bin/cmark-py for conflict avoidance | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | John Hein <jcfyecrayz> | ||||
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Romain Tartière <romain> | ||||
Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
Severity: | Affects Some People | CC: | romain | ||||
Priority: | --- | Flags: | bugzilla:
maintainer-feedback?
(romain) |
||||
Version: | Latest | ||||||
Hardware: | Any | ||||||
OS: | Any | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
John Hein
2023-11-01 11:18:55 UTC
Created attachment 246048 [details]
[patch] bin/cmark -> bin/cmark-py
Rename bin/cmark to bin/cmark-py.
This can be followed up with removal of CONFLICT markers in textproc/cmark and devel/llvm*.
> I suspect most py-CommonMark users use it as a python module rather than the command line tool
Same
All this look reasonable!
A commit in branch main references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=2c93a03bbcd528fcdce6e06ef7f2b71017e07050 commit 2c93a03bbcd528fcdce6e06ef7f2b71017e07050 Author: Romain Tartière <romain@FreeBSD.org> AuthorDate: 2023-11-11 01:42:15 +0000 Commit: Romain Tartière <romain@FreeBSD.org> CommitDate: 2023-11-11 01:54:11 +0000 textproc/py-CommonMark: Allow installation with textproc/cmark Both ports install bin/cmark. Users of textproc/py-CommonMark are supposely more interested in the python module rather than the command line tool: nothing in the ports tree seems to use bin/cmark from this port. Rename the command to cmark-py to fix conflict PR: 274848 Reported by: jcfyecrayz@liamekaens.com textproc/cmark/Makefile | 2 -- textproc/py-CommonMark/Makefile | 3 +-- textproc/py-CommonMark/files/patch-setup.py (new) | 11 +++++++++++ 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) |