Bug 277680
| Summary: | [NEW PORT] sysutils/dockerbox: Dockerd host running in Bhyve | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Chun Cheng Yeh <leafoliages> | ||||||
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu> | ||||||
| Status: | New --- | ||||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | 000.fbsd, freebsdbugs, lme, lwhsu | ||||||
| Priority: | --- | ||||||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||||
| Hardware: | amd64 | ||||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
If I understand it right the resulting package will contain 1.3GB image of Linux VM. I don't think this is the right way to do it. What about including checksum / signature of the VM file, adding "fetch" extra command to rc.d/dockerbox and let the VM image be downloaded by "service dockerbox fetch"? Sure. I will add the revised patch as attachment. However in this case, should the pkg-plist include the VM image? Created attachment 249269 [details]
Revised patch for new port: dockerbox
I've figured out the pkg-plist part. This is the revised patch file.
Having stumbled upon this in vermaden's "Valuable News" I wonder what's the current status of this PR? It is still waiting for approval. I was focusing on something else since I last submitted the patch and I forgot it's still here. I should get back to this pretty soon. |
Created attachment 249142 [details] The patch of the new port: dockerbox This port provides a linux VM running in bhyve that provides dockerd so that users can connect to the dockerd inside it through tcp port and use docker on FreeBSD.