Bug 28097

And the port does not install either. The patch in the FILESDIR cannot be 
applied cleanly, and removing it causes the install process to fail, too. 
This port does not work.

/Ernst

Is the port maintainer aware of this problem?

On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 02:21:59PM +0200, ernst@jollem.com wrote:
> 
> >Number:         28097
> >Category:       ports
> >Synopsis:       Checksum mismatch for www/hotjava
> >Originator:     Ernst de Haan
> >Release:        FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE i386
> >Organization:
> Jollem Information Technology
> >Environment:
> System: FreeBSD heinz.jollem.com 4.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE #5: Mon May 14 16:08:56 CEST 2001 root@heinz.jollem.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/HEINZ i386
> >Description:
> The checksum of www/hotjava is incorrect.
> 
> Current distinfo:     MD5 (hjb3_0-linux.sfx) = f554e615fe51cba5a6280af6f3e84764
> Downloaded distfile:  MD5 (hjb3_0-linux.sfx) = 52aacaeacacbe81c770a50f3b46f94fa

And in a followup:

> From: Ernst de Haan <ernst@jollem.com>
> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, ernst@jollem.com
> Subject: Re: ports/28097: Checksum mismatch for www/hotjava
> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:34:32 +0200
> 
>  And the port does not install either. The patch in the FILESDIR cannot be
>  applied cleanly, and removing it causes the install process to fail, too.
>  This port does not work.
> 
>  /Ernst

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
I am jealous of the first word in this sentence.

Comment 3 Peter Pentchev 2001-06-12 16:54:01 UTC

State Changed
From-To: open->feedback

Awaiting response from the port maintainer.

On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 06:43:48PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Is the port maintainer aware of this problem?

I just installed the port without a problem. 

-past

On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote:

> Is the port maintainer aware of this problem?

He is now.  I've just re-downloaded the distfile (both via ftp and http)
and the port appears to work fine.

-- 
Jose Marques

Okay, I will redownload the file and check again... Could yuo let me know what
the expected size of the file is? Perhaps it got truncated while downloading.

Ernst


Jose Marques wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> 
> > Is the port maintainer aware of this problem?
> 
> He is now.  I've just re-downloaded the distfile (both via ftp and http)
> and the port appears to work fine.
> 
> -- 
> Jose Marques
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
> 

-- 
Ernst de Haan
Java Architect
Jollem Information Technology

    "Come to me all who are weary and burdened
        and I will give you rest" -- Jesus Christ

On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 11:33:44PM +0200, Ernst de Haan wrote:
> Okay, I will redownload the file and check again... Could yuo let me know what
> the expected size of the file is? Perhaps it got truncated while downloading.

Sun's download page, the one where you select a download site, contains
the following text:

   You have chosen to download HotJava Browser
   The download size of the file hjb3_0-linux.sfx = 2,331,638 bytes.
      
Did you succeed in refetching it?

FWIW, I just fetched it (from the 'HTTP download' link, none of the FTP
links worked for me - connection refused on all of them) - it's the same
size, and the checksum matches.

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
This sentence claims to be an Epimenides paradox, but it is lying.

> Jose Marques wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > 
> > > Is the port maintainer aware of this problem?
> > 
> > He is now.  I've just re-downloaded the distfile (both via ftp and http)
> > and the port appears to work fine.

Hmmm:

   bash-2.05$ diff ~/hjb3_0-linux.sfx /usr/ports/distfiles/hjb3_0-linux.sfx
   Binary files /home/ernst/hjb3_0-linux.sfx and /usr/ports/distfiles/hjb3_0-linux.sfx differ

Okay, I redownloaded the file, and now it works :) Thanks, Peter and Jose!

Please close this PR.


Ernst


Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 11:33:44PM +0200, Ernst de Haan wrote:
> > Okay, I will redownload the file and check again... Could yuo let me know what
> > the expected size of the file is? Perhaps it got truncated while downloading.
> 
> Sun's download page, the one where you select a download site, contains
> the following text:
> 
>    You have chosen to download HotJava Browser
>    The download size of the file hjb3_0-linux.sfx = 2,331,638 bytes.
>       
> Did you succeed in refetching it?
> 
> FWIW, I just fetched it (from the 'HTTP download' link, none of the FTP
> links worked for me - connection refused on all of them) - it's the same
> size, and the checksum matches.
> 
> G'luck,
> Peter
> 
> -- 
> This sentence claims to be an Epimenides paradox, but it is lying.
> 
> > Jose Marques wrote:
> > > On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Is the port maintainer aware of this problem?
> > > 
> > > He is now.  I've just re-downloaded the distfile (both via ftp and http)
> > > and the port appears to work fine.
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
> 

-- 
Ernst de Haan
Java Architect
Jollem Information Technology

    "Come to me all who are weary and burdened
        and I will give you rest" -- Jesus Christ

Comment 9 Peter Pentchev 2001-06-15 16:19:24 UTC

State Changed
From-To: feedback->closed

The originator pronounced the problem fixed after a redownload.