Summary: | devel/folly: remove libc++ 19 workaround | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Dimitry Andric <dim> | ||||
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Dimitry Andric <dim> | ||||
Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
Severity: | Affects Some People | CC: | yuri | ||||
Priority: | --- | Flags: | yuri:
maintainer-feedback+
|
||||
Version: | Latest | ||||||
Hardware: | Any | ||||||
OS: | Any | ||||||
Bug Depends on: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 280562 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Dimitry Andric
2024-11-03 16:18:38 UTC
Created attachment 254909 [details]
devel/folly: remove libc++ 19 workaround
Approved, please commit it. A commit in branch main references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=efc339d7d34167976859cfcb2791abec5756dffa commit efc339d7d34167976859cfcb2791abec5756dffa Author: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> AuthorDate: 2024-11-03 16:18:52 +0000 Commit: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> CommitDate: 2024-11-03 20:53:19 +0000 devel/folly: remove libc++ 19 workaround For bug 281499 we added a workaround for the `peekView()` method returning a `std::basic_string<uint8_t>`, which is no longer supported in libc++ 19 and later. However, upstream folly has consolidated the `peek` and `peekView` methods into just `peek`, and is now returning a `std::span<uint8_t const>` instead [1], so the workaround is no longer needed. Remove it, and bump PORTREVISION so dependent ports get rebuilt. In particular, I was looking at a build failure of net/mvfst which was occurring in the folly headers, due to the `peek()` method being unavailable. [1] https://github.com/facebook/folly/commit/3f21ed6dd97f36ca6653b16d5b086b8b8a7efebc PR: 282522 Approved by: yuri (maintainer) MFH: 2024Q4 devel/folly/Makefile | 1 + devel/folly/files/patch-folly_io_Cursor.h (gone) | 18 ------------------ 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 18 deletions(-) I haven't MFH'd this commit, since the version of devel/folly in 2024Q4 is still behind. Do you mind if I MFH the more recent updates? I believe these are ports 45245542ab4631e2507e0f3ef5f68fd5d0942e3e and ports 578cf95f1c9ac336558e4c2553051789f682c680. (In reply to Dimitry Andric from comment #4) Hi Dimitry, Yes, please MFH, but please make sure that dependencies would build with this new version of folly. Thanks, Yuri (In reply to Yuri Victorovich from comment #5) Hmm, I generated the list of dependents: fbthrift-2024.09.30.00_1 /usr/ports/devel/fbthrift folly-2024.09.30.00_1 /usr/ports/devel/folly fb303-2024.09.30.00_1 /usr/ports/net/fb303 mvfst-2024.09.30.00_1 /usr/ports/net/mvfst wangle-2024.09.30.00_1 /usr/ports/net/wangle fizz-2024.09.30.00_1 /usr/ports/security/fizz proxygen-2024.09.30.00_1 /usr/ports/www/proxygen These all seem to be from the same releases from Facebook? I guess those should all be updated simultaneously then. Let's leave folly in the 2024Q4 branch as it is, since it will be just 1.5 month for the 2024Q1 branch to appear. |