| Summary: | correct port count | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Documentation | Reporter: | Michael W Lucas <mwlucas> | ||||||||
| Component: | Books & Articles | Assignee: | freebsd-doc (Nobody) <doc> | ||||||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||||||
| Priority: | Normal | ||||||||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||
|
Description
Michael W Lucas
2001-11-09 15:50:01 UTC
mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org wrote: > >Description: > > The count of ports in the Handbook is wrong. Handbook or FAQ? > I'm attaching two > patches for consideration: one contains an accurate count, one makes > the problem go away for good. I prefer the second, but it's an > admission that keeping track of the number of ports in the Handbook is > basically futile so people might not like that. Or we can assign the number of ports to an entity, and use that. In fact, we already have such an entity: os.numports (see share/sgml/freebsd.ent). I think we should use that in the FAQ just like we do in the Handbook. On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 05:21:22PM +0000, Dima Dorfman wrote: > Or we can assign the number of ports to an entity, and use that. In > fact, we already have such an entity: os.numports (see > share/sgml/freebsd.ent). I think we should use that in the FAQ just > like we do in the Handbook. Absolutely. Patch attached for the heck of it. However, os.numports is out of date, we're now over 6,000. ;) -- Michael Lucas mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org http://www.blackhelicopters.org/~mwlucas/ Big Scary Daemons: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/q/Big_Scary_Daemons State Changed From-To: open->closed Committed, thanks! |