Bug 32235
| Summary: | /usr/ports/net/ntop is not $LOCALBASE clean | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Thomas Hurst <freaky> |
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | bill fumerola <billf> |
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | Latest | ||
| Hardware: | Any | ||
| OS: | Any | ||
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports->billf Over to maintainer. each application doesn't install to localbase it installs into prefix. It looks for dependencies in localbase * David W. Chapman Jr. (dwcjr@inethouston.net) wrote: > each application doesn't install to localbase it installs into prefix. > It looks for dependencies in localbase Shouldn't these both be the same? -- Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst - freaky@aagh.net - http://www.aagh.net/ On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 01:21:11AM +0000, Thomas Hurst wrote: > * David W. Chapman Jr. (dwcjr@inethouston.net) wrote: > > > each application doesn't install to localbase it installs into prefix. > > It looks for dependencies in localbase > > Shouldn't these both be the same? > Only if the port doesn't have any dependencies but you still shouldn't assume they are in that case. Your patch may be correct, but assuming things about localbase when they should be prefix are incorrect. -- David W. Chapman Jr. dwcjr@inethouston.net Raintree Network Services, Inc. <www.inethouston.net> dwcjr@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer <www.FreeBSD.org> * David W. Chapman Jr. (dwcjr@inethouston.net) wrote: > On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 01:21:11AM +0000, Thomas Hurst wrote: > > * David W. Chapman Jr. (dwcjr@inethouston.net) wrote: > > > > > each application doesn't install to localbase it installs into > > > prefix. It looks for dependencies in localbase > > > > Shouldn't these both be the same? > > Only if the port doesn't have any dependencies Why would they change in this case? If I set localbase to /usr/pkg, shouldn't it both look for deps in there and install in there? This is why IANAPM (I Am Not A Ports Maintainer.. :) <makes note to read some docs> > but you still shouldn't assume they are in that case. Your patch may > be correct, but assuming things about localbase when they should be > prefix are incorrect. Ever get the feeling you shouldn't have changed something in the first place? No? Damn :) -- Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst - freaky@aagh.net - http://www.aagh.net/ State Changed
From-To: open->closed
committed.. sort of. CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --prefix=${PREFIX} is
the long way of saying 'GNU_CONFIGURE= yes'.
thanks for your submission.
|
The package's configure script wants to install to /usr/local, despite what $LOCALBASE is set to. Fix: Pass configure --prefix=${PREFIX}, or maybe set CONFIGURE_ENV+=PREFIX="${PREFIX}", or whatever. IANAPM :) The following patch made it install fine on my machine: HAS_CONFIGURE= yes +CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --prefix=${PREFIX} ALL_TARGET= INSTALL_TARGET= install install-man--qcG0XSFMbqI4BuxGVRHRx8FAiv1ROqUIAXPPfTkyY4ImsNeR Content-Type: text/plain; name="file.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="file.diff" --- Makefile.orig Mon Sep 25 13:21:30 2000 +++ Makefile Fri Nov 23 22:26:57 2001 @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ MAINTAINER= billf@FreeBSD.org How-To-Repeat: Change LOCALBASE in make.conf, cd /usr/ports/net/ntop && make, watch configure output.