| Summary: | [PATCH] - Formal Text for /docproj/who.html | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Documentation | Reporter: | Hiten Pandya <hiten> | ||||
| Component: | Books & Articles | Assignee: | freebsd-doc (Nobody) <doc> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||
| Priority: | Normal | ||||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Hiten Pandya
2001-12-14 00:30:01 UTC
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Hiten Pandya wrote: HP> >Severity: serious HP> >Priority: high How do you justify this classification? Just wondering. To me a serious/high-priority change is one where the documentation may be misleading enough to cause a user to damage their system or render it unbootable. HP> If you like the patch, submit it, dont like it? comment on it. :-) Comments below: HP> <p>Some of us can commit changes directly to the FreeBSD documentation HP> ! tree. The complete list of people with commit ``privileges'' can be HP> ! found in the <a href="../handbook/staff-doc.html">Handbook</a>.</p> I'd be inclined to lose the ``'' around privileges. To my mind they exist around privs to indicate that it is a slang term. HP> ! <p>The general public does not have commit privilges, but they write and HP> ! <b>submit documentation</b> nonetheless. Once the documenation has been HP> ! submitted according to the procedure layed out on the HP> ! <a href="submitting.html"><b>Submitting Documentation</b></a> page, it will HP> ! be noticed by one of the committers and will be reviewed & committed. HP> ! </p> I would phrase this as: <p>Members of the project who do not have commit privileges can contribute by <b>submitting documentation</b>. Details of how to do this are available on the <a href="submitting.html"><b>Submitting Documentation</b></a> page. Once the submission is received it will be reviewed & committed as appropriate.</p> Not sure about the need for <b> tags in there but they won't hurt, I guess. Just my comments, as per your request. -- Andrew McKay <andy@openirc.co.uk> > If you like the patch, submit it, dont like it? comment on it. :-) Comments below, as requested. > ! tree. The complete list of people with commit ``privileges'' can be As someone else pointed out, priviliges isn't slang or an abbreviation. Best to lose the quotes altogether I feel. > ! <p>The general public does not have commit privilges, but they write and > ! <b>submit documentation</b> nonetheless. Once the documenation has been ``The general public'' is either singular, or it's plural. Not both. You have also spelt documentation incorrectly. Time to install ispell ? ;) > ! submitted according to the procedure layed out on the s/layed/laid/ > ! be noticed by one of the committers and will be reviewed & committed. What's wrong with ``and'' instead of ``&'' ? Ceri -- keep a mild groove on State Changed From-To: open->closed Fixed the issues with the patch, plus fixed a bunch of other problems on this page. The changes should show up within the next 24 hours. Thanks for the submission! |