| Summary: | change request to allow teTeX to build WITHOUT_X11 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Steve Wills <steve> | ||||||
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Ade Lovett <ade> | ||||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||||
| Priority: | Normal | ||||||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
Steve Wills
2002-02-12 07:50:01 UTC
++ 12/02/02 02:29 -0500 - Steve Wills: | | >Number: 34864 | >Category: ports | >Synopsis: change request to allow teTeX to build WITHOUT_X11 What does the maintainer think of this? -- Pete Fritchman [petef@(databits.net|freebsd.org|csh.rit.edu)] finger petef@databits.net for PGP key Thanks for looking at this. One thing I forgot to mention was that the net
effect on the package if you build WITHOUT_X11 is to remove the xdvi stuff.
Nothing else is changed.
Thanks,
Steve
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 04:30:41AM -0500, Pete Fritchman wrote:
> ++ 12/02/02 02:29 -0500 - Steve Wills:
> |
> | >Number: 34864
> | >Category: ports
> | >Synopsis: change request to allow teTeX to build WITHOUT_X11
>
> What does the maintainer think of this?
>
> --
> Pete Fritchman [petef@(databits.net|freebsd.org|csh.rit.edu)]
> finger petef@databits.net for PGP key
--
Absurdity, n.:
A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own
opinion.
-- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"
Can someone please look at this? Its a low impact change and the maintainer hasn't responded for nearly two weeks now. Thanks, Steve -- It is impossible to experience one's death objectively and still carry a tune. -- Woody Allen Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports->ade I'll take care of this. State Changed From-To: open->closed Update committed, with a few minor alterations, thanks! General note: This port could really do with some portlint-TLC. |