Bug 37221

Summary: obsolete reference to seqpacket in mount_nfs.8
Product: Documentation Reporter: Joshua Goodall <joshua>
Component: Books & ArticlesAssignee: Tom Rhodes <trhodes>
Status: Closed FIXED    
Severity: Affects Only Me    
Priority: Normal    
Version: Latest   
Hardware: Any   
OS: Any   
Attachments:
Description Flags
file.diff none

Description Joshua Goodall 2002-04-18 11:00:05 UTC 
mount_nfs.8 refers to a -o seqpacket and related option -p that
aren't supported and are unlikely to be so unless someone resurrects
the ISO protocols as an RPC transport.
Comment 1 Christian Brueffer freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2003-05-07 07:19:48 UTC 
Responsible Changed
From-To: freebsd-doc->trhodes

trhodes will take care of this
Comment 2 Tom Rhodes freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2003-05-11 01:41:03 UTC 
State Changed
From-To: open->patched

The doc patch was not really committed as I just used vi(1) for a closer 
inspection of the mount_nfs(8) manual page.  Set state to patched until 
I MFC the committed version.
Comment 3 Tom Rhodes freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2003-05-13 15:46:29 UTC 
State Changed
From-To: patched->closed

MFC Complete.  Thanks for the submission!
Comment 4 Giorgos Keramidas freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2003-05-20 00:23:47 UTC 
Adding to the audit trail...

: ----- pending/51981 --------------------------------------------------
:
: Message-Id: <20030508134407.638ff0c9.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
: Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 13:44:07 -0400
: From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
:
: Josh, Lars,
:
: After looking over this a little closer, I'm totally lost at why these
: PRs were filed.
:
: -p is listed in the manual page as a historic and deprecated option.
: -P is listed in the manual page as obsolete.
:
: I can understand removing them both from the usage message, however
: they seem to be documented fine in the manual page (as obsolete).
:
: Currently I have an email in to murray and bmah about this, and
: my personal opinion is that the manual page is fine.
:
: Any opinions on just removing the -P and -p option from the code
: and leaving the manual page as is?  What do the other -doc committers
: think about this?
:
: ----- pending/51988 --------------------------------------------------
:
: Message-Id: <20030508231909.GO609@unixpages.org>
: Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 01:19:09 +0200
: From: Christian Brueffer <chris@unixpages.org>
:
: Apparently mbr removed ISO support from the code a while ago (which
: didn't work anyway) and these are leftovers.
: It's not fatal if this stays in, but as it's something that isn't
: even implemented anymore, it would be nice to be thrown out.