| Summary: | EMACS_PORT_NAME=xemacs21 forks make infinitely when installing other ports | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Jay Sachs <jay> | ||||
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Port Management Team <portmgr> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||
| Priority: | Normal | ||||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Jay Sachs
2002-04-30 14:30:01 UTC
Hi folks, I'd just like to confirm that I see the same behaviour on a fresh 5.0-CURRENT box (just upgraded from a fresh 5.0-RELEASE) and a fresh ports tree with nothing in /etc/make.conf other than EMACS_PORT_NAME?= xemacs21 Ciao, Sheldon. Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->shige Over to maintainer. State Changed From-To: open->feedback Is this still a problem with recent versions? Responsible Changed From-To: shige->freebsd-ports-bugs Maintainer was reset. State Changed From-To: feedback->closed Submitter's email address bounces. State Changed From-To: closed->open I'll care Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->sem Reopen as still actual State Changed From-To: open->closed - POLA violated bsd.emacs.mk should be rewritten State Changed From-To: closed->suspended With bugmeister hat on, change this from 'closed' to 'suspended' because from what I can determine, the problem still exists, but a solution is being being consider but being delayed until after 6.0 is out. -- Sem. State Changed From-To: suspended->open Reopen and assign to portmgr as affected on bsd.port.mk Responsible Changed From-To: sem->portmgr Reopen and assign to portmgr as affected on bsd.port.mk State Changed From-To: open->analyzed An updated patch based on this has been accepted for a test build on the cluster. State Changed From-To: analyzed->closed Committed, thanks. |