| Summary: | In section 2.9.11 of the Handbook "X-server" should be "X server" | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Documentation | Reporter: | Marc Fonvieille <marc> | ||||
| Component: | Books & Articles | Assignee: | freebsd-doc (Nobody) <doc> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||
| Priority: | Normal | ||||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Marc Fonvieille
2002-05-18 12:40:01 UTC
On 2002-05-18 13:32, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
> In section 2.9.11 of the Handbook we can find many "X-server" or "X
> server", only this latter should be used. Read the patch below for
> more details.
Hello Marc,
Well spotted. You are right that one of the two (and not both) should
be used. I'm more in favor of X server or X-server, since "X
server" can be wrapper in many funny ways as shown below:
After you install the X
server, ...
What do you think?
- Giorgos
On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 04:01:39PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > Hello Marc, Hi Giorgos ;) > > Well spotted. You are right that one of the two (and not both) should > be used. I'm more in favor of X server or X-server, since "X > server" can be wrapper in many funny ways as shown below: > > After you install the X > server, ... > > What do you think? On www.xfree86.org, they use XFree86 X server (http://www.xfree86.org/4.2.0/DESIGN.html for example). So X server seems to be the best solution. And maybe <title>Configure X-Server</title> should be <title>Configure XFree86 X Server</title>; and in the text X server should be used. cheers, Marc State Changed From-To: open->closed Fixed by new version of section 2.9.11 |