| Summary: | Missing period in section 2.9.11 of the Handbook | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Documentation | Reporter: | Marc Fonvieille <marc> | ||||
| Component: | Books & Articles | Assignee: | Giorgos Keramidas <keramida> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||
| Priority: | Normal | ||||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Marc Fonvieille
2002-05-19 11:40:01 UTC
Marc Fonvieille <marc@blackend.org> wrote: > --- chapter.sgml.org Sun May 19 11:31:25 2002 > +++ chapter.sgml Sun May 19 12:23:27 2002 > @@ -3897,7 +3897,7 @@ > > <para>The screen will go blank for a short period of time and > then a screen will appear with the message > - <quote>Congratulations, you've got a running server!</quote></para> > + <quote>Congratulations, you've got a running server!</quote>.</para> I think this is correct as it is. U.S. convention is to put closing punctuation inside the quote. Although this isn't always followed, especially in technical documents where "dd." and "dd" may mean different things, I don't think I've seen any reasons to duplicate punctuation like you suggest above. On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 08:00:29AM +0000, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> I think this is correct as it is. U.S. convention is to put closing
> punctuation inside the quote. Although this isn't always followed,
> especially in technical documents where "dd." and "dd" may mean
> different things, I don't think I've seen any reasons to duplicate
> punctuation like you suggest above.
It's just not the full stop of the sentence, the "!" is from a message
displayed on the screen, the punctuation of that message shouldn't
override the punctuation of the sentence.
Marc
State Changed From-To: open->closed The added period properly terminates the sentence. Since the exclamation mark is part of the quoted text, this change looks fine ;) Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-doc->keramida |