Summary: | gtk-config and glib-config filename conventions required? | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | brad <brad> | ||||
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | freebsd-gnome (Nobody) <gnome> | ||||
Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | gnome | ||||
Priority: | Normal | ||||||
Version: | Latest | ||||||
Hardware: | Any | ||||||
OS: | Any | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
brad
2002-06-17 16:00:12 UTC
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports->gnome Over to maintainers. Is there some pressing reason to do this other than making it look cleaner? I'm not trying to be antagonistic, just don't want to introduce breakage in the nether regions of the ports tree if it's not a critical thing. Thanks. Joe -- Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: marcus@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome State Changed From-To: open->closed Fixed, but in a different way. The xxx12-config files remain, but they are now symlinks to their xxx-config counterparts. Thanks for reporting. |