| Summary: | [PATCH] Typos in /etc/named/named.conf comments | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Documentation | Reporter: | Chris Pepper <pepper> | ||||
| Component: | Books & Articles | Assignee: | Giorgos Keramidas <keramida> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||
| Priority: | Normal | ||||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Chris Pepper
2002-07-27 04:20:01 UTC
... before that all gets commited :), substitute this in the relevant place above,
the only difference is an apostrophe on "it's".
@@ -16,8 +16,8 @@
// forward only;
// If you've got a DNS server around at your upstream provider, enter
-// its IP address here, and enable the line below. This will make you
-// benefit from its cache, thus reduce overall DNS traffic in the Internet.
+// it's IP address here, and enable the entry below. This will let you
+// benefit from its cache, thus reducing overall DNS traffic on the Internet.
/*
forwarders {
127.0.0.1;
Please ignore my previous submission. Dontya just love making a fool of youself in public ? On 2002-07-30 09:51 +0000, Tom Hukins wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 09:40:04PM -0700, M.J.Kouache wrote: > > ... before that all gets commited :), substitute this in the relevant place above, > > the only difference is an apostrophe on "it's". > > > > @@ -16,8 +16,8 @@ > > // forward only; > > > > // If you've got a DNS server around at your upstream provider, enter > > -// its IP address here, and enable the line below. This will make you > > -// benefit from its cache, thus reduce overall DNS traffic in the Internet. > > +// it's IP address here, and enable the entry below. This will let you > > +// benefit from its cache, thus reducing overall DNS traffic on the Internet. > > This part of the patch is incorrect. In the posessive form, "its" is > the correct spelling. The second change of the first line, s/make you/let you/ and the second line of changes though seem like a good idea to me. What do you others think? - Giorgos On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 11:53:54PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2002-07-30 09:51 +0000, Tom Hukins wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 09:40:04PM -0700, M.J.Kouache wrote:
> > >
> > > -// its IP address here, and enable the line below. This will make you
> > > -// benefit from its cache, thus reduce overall DNS traffic in the Internet.
> > > +// it's IP address here, and enable the entry below. This will let you
> > > +// benefit from its cache, thus reducing overall DNS traffic on the Internet.
> >
> > This part of the patch is incorrect. In the posessive form, "its" is
> > the correct spelling.
>
> The second change of the first line, s/make you/let you/ and the
> second line of changes though seem like a good idea to me. What do
> you others think?
Yes, I should have been clearer: I agree with the patch apart from
the "its" to "it's" change.
Tom
At 1:20 AM -0700 2002/08/07, Tom Hukins wrote: >The following reply was made to PR docs/41034; it has been noted by GNATS. > >From: Tom Hukins <tom@FreeBSD.org> >To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org> >Cc: "M.J.Kouache" <mjk@rhoda.fsworld.co.uk>, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org >Subject: Re: docs/41034: [PATCH] Typos in /etc/named/named.conf comments >Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 09:12:39 +0100 > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 11:53:54PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > On 2002-07-30 09:51 +0000, Tom Hukins wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 09:40:04PM -0700, M.J.Kouache wrote: > > > > > > > > -// its IP address here, and enable the line below. This >will make you > > > > -// benefit from its cache, thus reduce overall DNS traffic >in the Internet. > > > > +// it's IP address here, and enable the entry below. This >will let you > > > > +// benefit from its cache, thus reducing overall DNS >traffic on the Internet. > > > > > > This part of the patch is incorrect. In the posessive form, "its" is > > > the correct spelling. > > > > The second change of the first line, s/make you/let you/ and the > > second line of changes though seem like a good idea to me. What do > > you others think? > > Yes, I should have been clearer: I agree with the patch apart from > the "its" to "it's" change. Tom, You're right -- that's a straight error on my part. Somebody please apply the rest. Thanks, Chris Pepper -- Chris Pepper: <http://www.reppep.com/~pepper/> Rockefeller University: <http://www.rockefeller.edu/> State Changed From-To: open->patched Committed all the changes except for `its -> it's' in current. Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-doc->keramida I'll do the MFC. State Changed From-To: patched->closed Merged to -STABLE. Thank you, Chris :) |