| Summary: | documentation update to bridging section in handbook | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Documentation | Reporter: | steve <steve> | ||||
| Component: | Books & Articles | Assignee: | Ceri Davies <ceri> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||
| Priority: | Normal | ||||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
steve
2002-08-20 21:50:01 UTC
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-doc->ceri I seem to remember volunteering to commit this. On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 08:41:10PM -0000, steve@zpfe.com wrote: > ! <programlisting>net.link.ether.bridge_cfg=<--if1--> <--if2></programlisting> According to the manpage for bridge(4), this should look something like : net.link.ether.bridge_cfg=if1,if2 With your patch, this is coming out as : net.link.ether.bridge_cfg=<--if1--> <--if2> What was the intention ? If you wanted to add emphasis that the tokens if1 and if2 should be replaced then we can use <replaceable> markup here. Otherwise, can you let me know how you wanted this to be displayed ? I'm all for the change, but can't see what you wanted here. Thanks, Ceri -- you can't see when light's so strong you can't see when light is gone State Changed From-To: open->feedback Waiting to hear from originator. I think your proposed change is fine. The goal is to have the user replace: <--if1--> with the actual name of their interface. I thought that the <--...--> was a standard, but with a closer look at the page I took it from (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/routing.html), it's now clear that it isn't. S State Changed From-To: feedback->closed The revised change has been committed. Thanks for your contribution. |