Summary: | mail/zmailer | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Tilman Linneweh <tilman> |
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | freebsd-ports (Nobody) <ports> |
Status: | Closed FIXED | ||
Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | nectar |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | Latest | ||
Hardware: | Any | ||
OS: | Any |
Description
Tilman Linneweh
2002-09-08 22:10:04 UTC
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 11:09:35PM +0200, Tilman Linneweh wrote: > >Description: > > Two weeks ago nectar commited patch-smtpserver::smtpcmds.c to > this port. Commitlog says it should fix a potential remote > buffer overflow. > > nectar probably grabbed this patch from Bugtraq and committed > it without testing. No, I derived the (trivial) fix myself and tested it. The problem is simply that I generated the patch reversed ... thanks for catching! I've fixed it now. > Problem: The Patch is against 2.99.55. The FreeBSD port is at > version 2.99.51. So the patch did not apply. > > Version 2.99.51 doesn't contain the piece of buggy code, the > patch wants fix. Maybe you are thinking of some other issue? The issue I fixed was found in 2.99.51 by 3APA3A and was not reported to bugtraq at the time that I was notified. Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine <nectar@celabo.org> http://www.celabo.org/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se * "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> [Sun, 8 Sep 2002 19:04:53 -0500]: > > Two weeks ago nectar commited patch-smtpserver::smtpcmds.c to > > this port. Commitlog says it should fix a potential remote > > buffer overflow. > > > > nectar probably grabbed this patch from Bugtraq and committed > > it without testing. > > No, I derived the (trivial) fix myself and tested it. The problem is > simply that I generated the patch reversed ... thanks for catching! > I've fixed it now. Thanks. > > Problem: The Patch is against 2.99.55. The FreeBSD port is at > > version 2.99.51. So the patch did not apply. > > > > Version 2.99.51 doesn't contain the piece of buggy code, the > > patch wants fix. > > Maybe you are thinking of some other issue? The issue I fixed was > found in 2.99.51 by 3APA3A and was not reported to bugtraq at the time > that I was notified. No, i was just guessing too much, I don't have two weeks archive of Bugtraq in my brain :) regards arved State Changed From-To: open->closed patch was reversed. this has been fixed. |