| Summary: | Maintainer update: openag version 1.1.1 (port revision 1) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi> | ||||
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Tilman Keskinoz <arved> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | kris | ||||
| Priority: | Normal | ||||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Mohacsi Janos
2002-09-09 15:30:01 UTC
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports->arved I am discussing with Janos about openag. Hi Arved, Based on the mail conversation recently I recommend removing the openag port from the port tree. Here is the reference of e-mail conversation: ------------------------------------------------ > > In this PR you suggested to mark it broken. > > It looks like Development has stopped. They haven't released anything in > > nearly 4 months. So would it be okay, if i remove it? > > If it is useful for something again, it could be readded. > > Yes there is two changes in ports/42593: > 1. Some clean up to use fetch instead of curl or wget. > 2. Mark it broken. > > Can you commit the diff I have sent? Then you can remove it (move this > port to the Attic). (It would be good if we could keep the first changes > as a reference for later perusal). I think the Changes are already recorded for the History in GNATS, so there is no need to apply them before. Can you submit a follow up to 42593 so that the world notices that you approve this? Thanks arved State Changed From-To: open->patched I have committed a fix, thanks. I'll leave this PR in patched state, since I'll have to ask lioux, if he still opposes a removal. State Changed From-To: patched->suspended lioux leaves his ag port in the tree until it makes trouble, so do i. State Changed From-To: suspended->closed This port is about to be removed |