Bug 46294
| Summary: | /etc/services has obsolete/bogus information for IMAP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Base System | Reporter: | Larry Rosenman <ler> |
| Component: | conf | Assignee: | freebsd-bugs (Nobody) <bugs> |
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | 4.7-STABLE | ||
| Hardware: | Any | ||
| OS: | Any | ||
State Changed From-To: open->closed I've commented out ports r220 and 585 with a reference to this PR. Entries for udp along with tcp are, however, custom IANA procedure, so I left 143/udp and 993/udp. MFC in two weeks if nothing breaks. Thanks! |
/etc/services lists ports that are not now valid for IMAP stuff, per below news posting from Mark Crispin. From mrc@CAC.Washington.EDU Mon Dec 16 13:11:30 CST 2002 Article: 15971 of comp.mail.imap Path: lerami!lerami.lerctr.org!egsner!dfw-feed.news.verio.net!phl-feed.news.verio.net!newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu!panix!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.u.washington.edu!140.142.17.34.MISMATCH!news.u.washington.edu!shiva0.cac.washington.edu!mrc From: Mark Crispin <mrc@CAC.Washington.EDU> Newsgroups: comp.mail.imap Subject: Re: basic IMAP questions Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:42:15 -0800 Organization: Networks and Distributed Computing Lines: 23 Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.51.0212161037320.24671@shiva0.cac.washington.edu> References: <258BA3CB81631B83.A54FB99329FE21B0.E764716AC1FEA384@lp.airnews.net> <atl2e8$odp$1@lerami.lerctr.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: shiva0.cac.washington.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: nntp6.u.washington.edu 1040064137 101764 (None) 140.142.17.39 X-Complaints-To: help@cac.washington.edu In-Reply-To: <atl2e8$odp$1@lerami.lerctr.org> Content-Length: 314159 (believe this at your own risk) Xref: lerami!lerami.lerctr.org comp.mail.imap:15971 On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Larry Rosenman wrote: > IMAP uses port 143 by default, and > imap 143/tcp imap2 imap4 #Interim Mail Access Protocol v2 > imap 143/udp imap2 imap4 #Interim Mail Access Protocol v2 > imap3 220/tcp #Interactive Mail Access Protocol v3 > imap3 220/udp #Interactive Mail Access Protocol v3 > imap4-ssl 585/tcp #IMAP4+SSL (use of 585 is not recommended, > imap4-ssl 585/udp # use 993 instead) > imaps 993/tcp # imap4 protocol over TLS/SSL > imaps 993/udp Some corrections: there has never been a UDP IMAP. ports r220 and 585 were never used and never should have been allocated. The correct data is simply: imap 143/tcp imap2 imap4 #Internet Message Access Protocol imaps 993/tcp # imap4 protocol over TLS/SSL -- Mark -- http://staff.washington.edu/mrc Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate. Fix: Remove offending lines? How-To-Repeat: See above