Bug 56902

Summary: [patch] articles/fbsd-from-scratch: add/fix sgml tags
Product: Documentation Reporter: Josef El-Rayes <j.el-rayes>
Component: Books & ArticlesAssignee: freebsd-doc (Nobody) <doc>
Status: Closed FIXED    
Severity: Affects Only Me    
Priority: Normal    
Version: Latest   
Hardware: Any   
OS: Any   
Attachments:
Description Flags
article.sgml.diff
none
article.sgml.diff none

Description Josef El-Rayes 2003-09-15 21:40:15 UTC 
		docs/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/fbsd-from-scratch/article.sgml:
		o add missing application-tags
		o use note instead of itemizedlist
Comment 1 Simon L. B. Nielsen freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2003-09-16 21:38:11 UTC 
On 2003.09.15 22:35:55 +0200, Josef El-Rayes wrote:

> --- article.sgml.orig	Mon Sep 15 18:39:23 2003
> +++ article.sgml	Mon Sep 15 18:50:50 2003
> @@ -396,9 +396,9 @@
>  
>      <para>Other areas are prepared for configuration, but will not work
>        until stage two is completed.  For example we have copied files to
> -      configure printing and X11.  Printing however is likely to need
> +      configure printing and <application>X11</application>.  Printing however is likely to need


I don't think X11 should be marked up as application, since it is not
really an application, but rather the protocol/framework.  Have you
found any other places where it's marked up with the application tag?

-- 
Simon L. Nielsen
FreeBSD Documentation Team
Comment 2 Josef El-Rayes 2003-09-16 22:14:53 UTC 
"Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> On 2003.09.15 22:35:55 +0200, Josef El-Rayes wrote:
> 
> > --- article.sgml.orig	Mon Sep 15 18:39:23 2003
> > +++ article.sgml	Mon Sep 15 18:50:50 2003
> > @@ -396,9 +396,9 @@
> >  
> >      <para>Other areas are prepared for configuration, but will not work
> >        until stage two is completed.  For example we have copied files to
> > -      configure printing and X11.  Printing however is likely to need
> > +      configure printing and <application>X11</application>.  Printing however is likely to need
> 
> I don't think X11 should be marked up as application, since it is not
> really an application, but rather the protocol/framework.  Have you
> found any other places where it's marked up with the application tag?

for me it was in this association talking about X11 as an association,
but i looked at the handbook chapter about X and only XFree86 was marked
up as application so you are right here.

shall i redo this patch and pr 56903 to leave X11 with markup?

-josef

-- 
www: http://www.daemon.li
nic-hdl: JER1080312-NICAT
BSD in AT: www.bsdcode.at
"Make World - Not War!"
Comment 3 Simon L. B. Nielsen freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2003-09-16 23:22:06 UTC 
On 2003.09.16 23:14:53 +0200, Josef El-Rayes wrote:
> "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > I don't think X11 should be marked up as application, since it is not
> > really an application, but rather the protocol/framework.  Have you
> > found any other places where it's marked up with the application tag?
> 
> for me it was in this association talking about X11 as an association,
> but i looked at the handbook chapter about X and only XFree86 was marked
> up as application so you are right here.
> 
> shall i redo this patch and pr 56903 to leave X11 with markup?


I think that would be preferable.

-- 
Simon L. Nielsen
FreeBSD Documentation Team
Comment 4 Josef El-Rayes 2003-09-21 16:15:34 UTC 
hi!

i reworked the patch to not touch X11.
it marks up "make" as application and not as filename.
it marks up a hint as "note:" and not as a single item in an
itemizedlist.

greets, josef
-- 
www: http://www.daemon.li
nic-hdl: JER1080312-NICAT
BSD in AT: www.bsdcode.at
"Make World - Not War!"
Comment 5 Simon L. B. Nielsen freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2003-10-18 15:14:07 UTC 
State Changed
From-To: open->closed

Committed with some modifications, mainly to seperate whitespace 
changes from content changes. 
Thanks for the submission!