Bug 57824
| Summary: | ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires miibus | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Documentation | Reporter: | Eugene Grosbein <ports> |
| Component: | Books & Articles | Assignee: | freebsd-doc (Nobody) <doc> |
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | iedowse |
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | Latest | ||
| Hardware: | Any | ||
| OS: | Any | ||
|
Description
Eugene Grosbein
2003-10-10 03:40:21 UTC
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:34:03 +0800 (KRAST) Eugene Grosbein <eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su> wrote: > > >Number: 57824 > >Category: docs > >Synopsis: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires miibus NAME ed -- ethernet device driver SYNOPSIS device miibus device ed0 at isa? port 0x280 irq 5 iomem 0xd8000 That is in my STABLE tree. NAME ed -- ethernet device driver SYNOPSIS device miibus device ed That is on my current box. Which branch did you want the MFC to? -- Tom Rhodes On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, 08:10-0700, Tom Rhodes wrote: > The following reply was made to PR docs/57824; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> > To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su> > Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, iedowse@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Re: docs/57824: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires > miibus > Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 11:02:58 -0400 > > On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:34:03 +0800 (KRAST) > Eugene Grosbein <eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su> wrote: > > > > > >Number: 57824 > > >Category: docs > > >Synopsis: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires miibus > > NAME > ed -- ethernet device driver > > SYNOPSIS > device miibus > device ed0 at isa? port 0x280 irq 5 iomem 0xd8000 > > That is in my STABLE tree. > > NAME > ed -- ethernet device driver > > SYNOPSIS > device miibus > device ed > > That is on my current box. > > Which branch did you want the MFC to? From docs/57824: >Release: FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE i386 -- Maxim Konovalov, maxim@macomnet.ru, maxim@FreeBSD.org On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 08:30:21 -0700 (PDT) Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> wrote: > The following reply was made to PR docs/57824; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> > To: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@freebsd.org> > Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: docs/57824: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires > miibus > Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 19:27:11 +0400 (MSD) > > On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, 08:10-0700, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > > The following reply was made to PR docs/57824; it has been noted by GNATS. > > > > From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> > > To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su> > > Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, iedowse@FreeBSD.org > > Subject: Re: docs/57824: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires > > miibus > > Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 11:02:58 -0400 > > > > On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:34:03 +0800 (KRAST) > > Eugene Grosbein <eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su> wrote: > > > > > > > > >Number: 57824 > > > >Category: docs > > > >Synopsis: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires miibus > > > > NAME > > ed -- ethernet device driver > > > > SYNOPSIS > > device miibus > > device ed0 at isa? port 0x280 irq 5 iomem 0xd8000 > > > > That is in my STABLE tree. > > > > NAME > > ed -- ethernet device driver > > > > SYNOPSIS > > device miibus > > device ed > > > > That is on my current box. > > > > Which branch did you want the MFC to? > > From docs/57824: > > >Release: FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE i386 It's fixed for the next release; is it normal to MFC something this trivial to a past release branch? The GENERIC config file explains what devices require miibus(4). So does the handbook, and the LINT file. -- Tom Rhodes [...] > > >Release: FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE i386 > > It's fixed for the next release; is it normal to MFC something > this trivial to a past release branch? The GENERIC config file > explains what devices require miibus(4). So does the handbook, > and the LINT file. I am pretty sure we can wait until after 4.9. -- Maxim Konovalov, maxim@macomnet.ru, maxim@FreeBSD.org On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 08:00:51PM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > [...] > > > >Release: FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE i386 > > > > It's fixed for the next release; is it normal to MFC something > > this trivial to a past release branch? The GENERIC config file > > explains what devices require miibus(4). So does the handbook, > > and the LINT file. > > I am pretty sure we can wait until after 4.9. Erm... What do you mean, 'wait'? What Tom is saying is that the branch currently referred to as -STABLE, which *is* what was formerly known as 4.8-STABLE, but is right now called 4.9-RC due to the pending 4.9-RELEASE -- well, that branch already documents that ed needs miibus. I can also confirm that: my ed(4) manpage shows 'device miibus' in the synopsis section. This was already MFC'd in ed.4 rev. 1.19.2.10 from February 17th, committed by - surprise, surprise - Tom Rhodes :) G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@sbnd.net roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 If this sentence were in Chinese, it would say something else. On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 19:20:29 +0300 Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 08:00:51PM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > > [...] > > > > >Release: FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE i386 > > > > > > It's fixed for the next release; is it normal to MFC something > > > this trivial to a past release branch? The GENERIC config file > > > explains what devices require miibus(4). So does the handbook, > > > and the LINT file. > > > > I am pretty sure we can wait until after 4.9. > > Erm... What do you mean, 'wait'? What Tom is saying is that > the branch currently referred to as -STABLE, which *is* what was > formerly known as 4.8-STABLE, but is right now called 4.9-RC due > to the pending 4.9-RELEASE -- well, that branch already documents > that ed needs miibus. I can also confirm that: my ed(4) manpage > shows 'device miibus' in the synopsis section. > > This was already MFC'd in ed.4 rev. 1.19.2.10 from February 17th, > committed by - surprise, surprise - Tom Rhodes :) I've done so much -doc that I completely forgot that I did this! Thanks for pointing this out, I think this PR can be closed now. What does our submitter say? -- Tom Rhodes [...] > > I am pretty sure we can wait until after 4.9. > > Erm... What do you mean, 'wait'? What Tom is saying is that > the branch currently referred to as -STABLE, which *is* what was > formerly known as 4.8-STABLE, but is right now called 4.9-RC due > to the pending 4.9-RELEASE -- well, that branch already documents > that ed needs miibus. I can also confirm that: my ed(4) manpage > shows 'device miibus' in the synopsis section. > > This was already MFC'd in ed.4 rev. 1.19.2.10 from February 17th, > committed by - surprise, surprise - Tom Rhodes :) You are quite right :-) -- Maxim Konovalov, maxim@macomnet.ru, maxim@FreeBSD.org Tom Rhodes wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:34:03 +0800 (KRAST)
> Eugene Grosbein <eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su> wrote:
>
> >
> > >Number: 57824
> > >Category: docs
> > >Synopsis: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires miibus
>
> NAME
> ed -- ethernet device driver
>
> SYNOPSIS
> device miibus
> device ed0 at isa? port 0x280 irq 5 iomem 0xd8000
>
> That is in my STABLE tree.
I'm sorry, my 'man 4 ed' shows me /usr/share/man/cat4/ed.4.gz
that is staled since 2001. Please close this PR.
Eugene Grosbein
State Changed From-To: open->closed Submitter agrees that the change has already been MFC'd :) Still, thanks for reporting what you thought was a genuine FreeBSD problem! |
