Bug 58855
| Summary: | About lang/ruby18's fileutils vs ruby-shim-ruby18's fileutils | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | jfkimura |
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Akinori MUSHA <knu> |
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | jfkimura |
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | Latest | ||
| Hardware: | Any | ||
| OS: | Any | ||
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->knu Over to maintainer I took an answer by knu san directly and was able to understand. This PR hopes to be already close tks --- Fumihiko Kimura <jfkimura@yahoo.co.jp> __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! BB is Broadband by Yahoo! http://bb.yahoo.co.jp/ State Changed From-To: open->closed The difference is in File.basename() and I don't feel like patching shim's fileutils.rb but I'd rather encourage script writers to make their scripts follow the 1.8 behaviour. The submitter kindly agreed. Thanks! |
I am a user of ruby. There is a tool of fileutils.rb in lang/ruby18, but movement in lang/ruby16-shim-ruby18 seems to be different. I wanted to make it seem to be 'cp -Rp /home/fkimura /tmp'. How-To-Repeat: sample script --- #!/usr/bin/env ruby require 'fileutils' IN1 = "/home/fkimura" module FileUtils16 def FileUtils16.cp_r(src, dest, *options) begin FileUtils.cp_r(src, dest, *options) rescue TypeError optionhash = {} options.each { |o| optionhash[o] = true } FileUtils.cp_r(src, dest, optionhash) end end end FileUtils16.cp_r("#{IN1}/", "/tmp", :preserve) exit 0 --- - ruby1.6.8 + ruby-shim-ruby18 (using USE_RUBY_FEATURES=fileutils) It was carried out to think in this case. - ruby18 A file is copied after directory of fkimura was made under /tmp in this case. Cannot you unify it?