Summary: | Update port: sysutils/smartmontools to 5.26 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Robin Breathe <robin> | ||||
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Sergei Kolobov <sergei> | ||||
Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | martines | ||||
Priority: | Normal | ||||||
Version: | Latest | ||||||
Hardware: | Any | ||||||
OS: | Any | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Robin Breathe
2003-11-30 01:00:41 UTC
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->sergei I'll take it. Eduard, Please review the patch at the following URL: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/59809 and let us know if you approve it. Thanks! Sergei State Changed From-To: open->feedback Awaiting maintainer's feedback. Sergei, It looks fine to me....I've actually been meaning to generate this myself, but have been tied up with other work. The only question I have why switch to using the make variable 'PORTDOCS' rather than 'DOCS'? Did something get updated? I also noticed the %%PORTDOCS%% portion of the packing list was removed. Since I am definitely NOT an expert in port packaging, I do not know if this is bad or good. However, as far as the basic port itself, since the only real change is an update to distfile/Makefile to use the latest stable release, I do not see any issues. Ed ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sergei Kolobov" <sergei@FreeBSD.org> To: "Eduard Martinescu" <martines@rochester.rr.com> Cc: "Robin Breathe" <robin@isometry.net>; <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 11:22 AM Subject: Re: ports/59809: Update port: sysutils/smartmontools to 5.26 > Eduard, > > Please review the patch at the following URL: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/59809 > > and let us know if you approve it. Thanks! > > Sergei > Ed,
On 2003-12-05 at 00:06 -0500, Eduard Martinescu wrote:
> It looks fine to me....I've actually been meaning to generate this myself,
> but have been tied up with other work. The only question I have why switch
> to using the make variable 'PORTDOCS' rather than 'DOCS'? Did something get
> updated? I also noticed the %%PORTDOCS%% portion of the packing list was
> removed. Since I am definitely NOT an expert in port packaging, I do not
> know if this is bad or good. However, as far as the basic port itself,
> since the only real change is an update to distfile/Makefile to use the
> latest stable release, I do not see any issues.
Thanks for the review. I will leave out the PORTDOCS part as I do not
like that myself. (NOTE: I am planning to submit a PR to change that
mechanism a bit).
Sergei
State Changed From-To: feedback->analyzed Got maintainer's approval. State Changed From-To: analyzed->closed Committed, thanks! |